Bullying isn’t hate crime

I never got around to bemoaning the government’s plans to make homophobic attacks a new “hate crime”. Ever since the idea of religious hatred was outlawed I’ve become increasingly sceptical of this new type of legislation; in most cases it does little more than add a little more public “tut-tutting” to something that is already a crime. In some cases (though in practice not often) it can interfere with freedom of speech and the right to criticise. In many more cases it creates a culture whereby people self-censor rather than risk opprobrium and possible legal action. And even where homophobia is endemic – specifically schools and the problem of homophobic bullying – it is hard to see what such a law will do since it is an issue which affects heterosexual kids as much as young lesbians and gays. Do we lessen the sentence because the victim happens to not be gay? Is the clunking fist of the law the best way to solve what is at heart a problem of discipline in schools?

The bullying aspect raises its ugly head again in the announcement yesterday to legislate against inciting hatred against disabled people. The article refers to levels of bullying directed at disabled people appears to be on the rise, but quickly apportions the blame on “happy slapping culture”. It doesn’t seem to be a deep-seated hatred of disabled people, just a general human tendency to pick on anyone who is different. We simply can’t go down a list of differences and make incitement of hatred against them illegal. Where to red-haired people and extremely freckly people fit into all this for example? Anyone who has ever had a childhood can attest that these two overlapping groups are, one of the main, possibly the main, victims of bullying. Yet I can’t see any serious politician legislating against the incitement to ginger hatred.

Bullying isn’t about hatred; it’s about fear – of both parties – and control. I know from personal experience that the line between victim and bully is an extremely fine one: gain a couple of inches in height and you stop being the fat kid everyone picks on and transform into a walking brick shit house that no-one messes with. It’s a cycle of violence and one which I only just broke free of (I like to think). But all too often it is about lashing out at anyone rather than face up to your own feelings of inadequacy.

None of that can be dealt with by hate crime legislation and we would be foolish to attempt to do so. We would criminalise unsympathetic but nonetheless vulnerable people and lose all sense of proportion.


  1. All the talk of ‘hate crime’ is dreadfully Orwellian. Isn’t incitement to violence a crime anyway, along with discrimination? Bullying is bullying, regardless of who it is aimed at.

  2. Next time you see a report in the paper about red-haired people or ‘extreme’ freckly’ people (whatever they are supposed to be) getting a kicking in the street… drop me a line and let me know will you.

  3. as one of the smart freckly red haired people i do know the impact of bullying first hand, despite this young gay people, particularly in rural areas have a depressingly high rate of suicide due to bullying.

    Despite this, anti hate SPEACH legislation has recently backfired in Australia where it has given a platform, political power and a welcomed martyrdom to a nasty Christian bigot group called catch the fire ministry.

  4. As things stand, bullies bully because no one takes it seriously enough to punish bullying. Maybe, just maybe, if school bullying were made an actual hate crime, fear of punishment just might put an end to it, or at least cut down the incidence and severity of this social plague. If bullying isnt a hate crime, it sure isn’t an act of love to destroy someone else’s physical or emotional health through rejection, ridicule and sometimes physical attacks!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.