Powered by WordPress | Theme by mg12 | Valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 3
  • Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010 at 23:57 | #1

    Sometimes I am quite glad that I am not going to Spring conf. Even if it DOES mean missing out on sexually harrassing you :P

  • James Graham
    Thursday, March 4th, 2010 at 00:01 | #2

    Jennie, I’m not convinced that a few hundred miles will ever stop you from sexually harrassing me! :)

  • Thursday, March 4th, 2010 at 00:03 | #3

    Good point, well made.

    *goose*

  • Thursday, March 4th, 2010 at 10:37 | #4

    Instead of polite contempt, they should be treated the same as any other murderous cult.

  • James Graham
    Thursday, March 4th, 2010 at 11:08 | #5

    I think most organised religions could be characterised (fairly or otherwise) as murderous cults but in a liberal, secular society we must always be careful not to tar all religious followers with the same brush.

    Unless it emerges that there are actual murderers on the stand, polite contempt is the way to go I feel.

  • Friday, March 5th, 2010 at 13:56 | #6

    CCHR have some peculiar strategies even by $cientology standards; I remember a few years ago, while walking through Manningham in Bradford, it appeared most of the Asian-owned shops on Oak Lane were displaying posters in their windows advertising this lot alongside the ones you’d normally expect to see. No idea if $cientologists thought they’d have a chance of proselytising to Muslims; but if so it appeared they were rebuffed in fairly short order as I haven’t seen any of their literature returning to that part of town. I hope, and fully expect, that CCHR will be given the bum’s rush if they try on their brand of dangerous woo at Birmingham.

  • Ellen B
    Monday, March 8th, 2010 at 11:17 | #7

    I think the real problem isn’t that these people will be given a chance to show their ‘Psychiatry: an Industry of Death’ film. Neither is it that several people with psychiatric disorders have died in Scientology’s ‘care’. What bothers me is that the party I voted for (or in particular, their exhibition organization) can be so staggeringly naïve. This could never have been anything but controversial, and the potential harm far outweighs the benefit of getting a couple of grand from the exhibitor.

  • Monday, March 8th, 2010 at 12:06 | #8

    “Ultimately what I’m saying here is: be aware of who they are. And if you do happen to have a V for Vendetta mask…”

    I do.
    Others too.
    We are.
    We will.

    Anyone in doubt, click the website link, take the video very seriously. The CCHR need to be stopped.

  • Tuesday, March 9th, 2010 at 16:15 | #9
  • Tuesday, March 9th, 2010 at 17:26 | #10

    CCHR booth has been pulled from the party conference. Just waiting for an update to the site and stuff.

  • James Graham
    Wednesday, March 10th, 2010 at 17:58 | #11

    I hope you are right David. Any more news?

  • Wednesday, March 10th, 2010 at 23:54 | #12

    Just that the booth has been pulled and the Scilons can’t go back there.

  • Friday, July 30th, 2010 at 14:07 | #13

    Given that the Royal Palace had recently barred entrance, to their summer garden party, to Nick Griffin of the British National Party, maybe its time for political parties to apply intelligent conscience to their choice of stall holders.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

1 trackbacks/pingbacks
TOP