<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Policy Committee says no to Clegg: game over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/09/22/policy-committee-says-no-to-clegg-game-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/09/22/policy-committee-says-no-to-clegg-game-over/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/09/22/policy-committee-says-no-to-clegg-game-over/comment-page-1/#comment-216284</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2763#comment-216284</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Mark, that was a dumb thing of me to write.  Nonetheless, the party does need a means of communicating to the media and the public purse should not be used by MPs to spin against their own parties.

Perhaps we should pay for the conference week&#039;s press operation out of the party purse and ensure that neither member nor taxpayer is being screwed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Mark, that was a dumb thing of me to write.  Nonetheless, the party does need a means of communicating to the media and the public purse should not be used by MPs to spin against their own parties.</p>
<p>Perhaps we should pay for the conference week&#8217;s press operation out of the party purse and ensure that neither member nor taxpayer is being screwed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Littlewood</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/09/22/policy-committee-says-no-to-clegg-game-over/comment-page-1/#comment-216267</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Littlewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2763#comment-216267</guid>
		<description>James,

On a point of info...

Unless, things have changed in the last two years (and I&#039;m pretty certain they haven&#039;t), the press office staff are all paid for by POLD (i.e. Short Funds). POLD also pays the Federal Party for rent of the office space in Cowley Street and the accompanying services (phones, payroll, toilet paper etc). The payment to the party is...cough...at the high end of market prices. Membership subscriptions are certainly not being used to fund the press team.

The press office staff are taxpayer-funded to provide public information about the activities of the LibDem MPs.

The guidelines are notoriously unclear, but it would not be total hyperbole to say that it would be illegal for the professional press team to be promoting the FPC line. Certainly, if Vince and the FPC disagree on polcy X, the press officers are duty bound to spin (sorry...&quot;provide public information about&quot;) Vince&#039;s position.

This might raise a whole range of other problems - but not the ones you highlight here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>On a point of info&#8230;</p>
<p>Unless, things have changed in the last two years (and I&#8217;m pretty certain they haven&#8217;t), the press office staff are all paid for by POLD (i.e. Short Funds). POLD also pays the Federal Party for rent of the office space in Cowley Street and the accompanying services (phones, payroll, toilet paper etc). The payment to the party is&#8230;cough&#8230;at the high end of market prices. Membership subscriptions are certainly not being used to fund the press team.</p>
<p>The press office staff are taxpayer-funded to provide public information about the activities of the LibDem MPs.</p>
<p>The guidelines are notoriously unclear, but it would not be total hyperbole to say that it would be illegal for the professional press team to be promoting the FPC line. Certainly, if Vince and the FPC disagree on polcy X, the press officers are duty bound to spin (sorry&#8230;&#8221;provide public information about&#8221;) Vince&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>This might raise a whole range of other problems &#8211; but not the ones you highlight here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/09/22/policy-committee-says-no-to-clegg-game-over/comment-page-1/#comment-216258</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2763#comment-216258</guid>
		<description>Ludicrous, ludicrous situation. We&#039;re meant to be a democratic party...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ludicrous, ludicrous situation. We&#8217;re meant to be a democratic party&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
