<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jo Swinson and those complaints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-213637</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2519#comment-213637</guid>
		<description>#1: If you actually bothered to read the Telegraph article, you&#039;d find that&#039;s exactly what she did do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1: If you actually bothered to read the Telegraph article, you&#8217;d find that&#8217;s exactly what she did do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reckons</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-213633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reckons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 07:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2519#comment-213633</guid>
		<description>Good work James!

It&#039;s shocking that the BBC has not responded to this at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work James!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s shocking that the BBC has not responded to this at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpy old man</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-213628</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpy old man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2519#comment-213628</guid>
		<description>When submitting a receipt in proof of claims, it is normal practice in the real world to put a line through the items not claimed for, and put the revised amount on the bottom of the receipt.  Can you explain why Ms Swinson - in common with many other MP&#039;s similarly embarrassed - failed to follow this simple procedure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When submitting a receipt in proof of claims, it is normal practice in the real world to put a line through the items not claimed for, and put the revised amount on the bottom of the receipt.  Can you explain why Ms Swinson &#8211; in common with many other MP&#8217;s similarly embarrassed &#8211; failed to follow this simple procedure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
