<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jo Swinson and The Telegraph: complaints, complaints, complaints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-213611</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-213611</guid>
		<description>Rob, with apologies for the delay in responding, I have now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;answered your question&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, with apologies for the delay in responding, I have now <a href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/06/06/jo-swinson-and-those-complaints/" rel="nofollow">answered your question</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Parsons</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-213413</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Parsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-213413</guid>
		<description>OK, I have a nice letter from the Telegraph - http://acomfortableplace.blogspot.com/2009/06/telegraph-and-eyeliner-story.html . What now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I have a nice letter from the Telegraph &#8211; <a href="http://acomfortableplace.blogspot.com/2009/06/telegraph-and-eyeliner-story.html" rel="nofollow">http://acomfortableplace.blogspot.com/2009/06/telegraph-and-eyeliner-story.html</a> . What now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-213039</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-213039</guid>
		<description>I phoned The Guardian just now and they say they are looking into correcting their story because they have had many e-mails about it and understand it may not be correct. Fingers crossed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I phoned The Guardian just now and they say they are looking into correcting their story because they have had many e-mails about it and understand it may not be correct. Fingers crossed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibCync</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-212903</link>
		<dc:creator>LibCync</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-212903</guid>
		<description>Can someone other than the &quot;victim&quot; complain to the PCC? I thought it was one of their ridiculous rules that they couldn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone other than the &#8220;victim&#8221; complain to the PCC? I thought it was one of their ridiculous rules that they couldn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-212841</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-212841</guid>
		<description>Nadine published some exremely silly, very defamatory, very actionable nonsense about the Barclay Brothers and Telegraph motivation. Viz that they were trying to clear out the established parties for an anti-Europe Reichdom led by the BNP and UKIP.

That was why they were after her. She averred. Not because her main home doesn&#039;t particularly exist in the normal understanding.

Clearly they could have just asked for this to be removed and not grounded the whole blog. In fact, leaning from the Schillings error of pulling blogs before, that would have been far better.

So: &lt;i&gt;has David Cameron pulled Nadine&#039;s blog?&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nadine published some exremely silly, very defamatory, very actionable nonsense about the Barclay Brothers and Telegraph motivation. Viz that they were trying to clear out the established parties for an anti-Europe Reichdom led by the BNP and UKIP.</p>
<p>That was why they were after her. She averred. Not because her main home doesn&#8217;t particularly exist in the normal understanding.</p>
<p>Clearly they could have just asked for this to be removed and not grounded the whole blog. In fact, leaning from the Schillings error of pulling blogs before, that would have been far better.</p>
<p>So: <i>has David Cameron pulled Nadine&#8217;s blog?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-212836</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-212836</guid>
		<description>&gt;What an utterly stupid act of fuckwittery.

Yes.

&quot;Telegraph poisons own scoop&quot;.

Will Lewis God is in the Detail FAIL. I wish I was Jo Swinson&#039;s favourite charity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;What an utterly stupid act of fuckwittery.</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Telegraph poisons own scoop&#8221;.</p>
<p>Will Lewis God is in the Detail FAIL. I wish I was Jo Swinson&#8217;s favourite charity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-212830</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-212830</guid>
		<description>Done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Brooksbank</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/05/23/jo-swinson-and-the-telegraph-complaints-complaints-complaints/comment-page-1/#comment-212825</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Brooksbank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2487#comment-212825</guid>
		<description>I have contacted the Telegraph, Guardian and BBC to express my annoyance at their reporting.

I have pointed out to the BBC that they too are publicly funded and their reporters make expenses claims.

I have also told them that if Jo Swinson were to sue them I shall contribute to her expenses (legal costs).

Judith Brooksbank

PS I also think they have been highly unfair to Phil Willis who got things wrong when suffering from a stroke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have contacted the Telegraph, Guardian and BBC to express my annoyance at their reporting.</p>
<p>I have pointed out to the BBC that they too are publicly funded and their reporters make expenses claims.</p>
<p>I have also told them that if Jo Swinson were to sue them I shall contribute to her expenses (legal costs).</p>
<p>Judith Brooksbank</p>
<p>PS I also think they have been highly unfair to Phil Willis who got things wrong when suffering from a stroke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
