Comments on: Kawczynski is a disgrace http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/01/24/kawczynski-is-a-disgrace/ “ferocity with a purpose” Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John Hemming MP http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/01/24/kawczynski-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-210130 John Hemming MP Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:50:19 +0000 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2253#comment-210130 That is a different and entirely reasonable tack. That is a different and entirely reasonable tack.

]]> By: James Graham http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/01/24/kawczynski-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-210129 James Graham Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:43:58 +0000 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2253#comment-210129 Maybe, but no-one forced Kawczynski to hand over the letter. MPs cannot complain about a creeping invasion of their privileges and then become a wobbling jelly at the first sign of a police uniform. Whatever happened to vigilence? Maybe, but no-one forced Kawczynski to hand over the letter. MPs cannot complain about a creeping invasion of their privileges and then become a wobbling jelly at the first sign of a police uniform. Whatever happened to vigilence?

]]> By: John Hemming MP http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2009/01/24/kawczynski-is-a-disgrace/comment-page-1/#comment-210127 John Hemming MP Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:14:37 +0000 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=2253#comment-210127 If the documents are privileged then they are privileged regardless of the offence alleged. This applies to legal and professional privilege. The fact that the Standards and Privileges Committee and/or the MP concerned may pass over such material is a separate issue. If the documents are privileged then they are privileged regardless of the offence alleged.

This applies to legal and professional privilege. The fact that the Standards and Privileges Committee and/or the MP concerned may pass over such material is a separate issue.

]]>