Powered by WordPress | Theme by mg12 | Valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 3
  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 12:51 | #1

    I think that is why I started my whole tribute to Oliver on the way into the station.

    Not only was it easier to offload the other characters from Ivor’s carriages, but although I did go home that day to get a yawn from my bedside Bagpuss, it was Ivor that seemed to have the biggest impact on me to for some reason.

  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 13:02 | #2

    Don’t blame me: I voted for Noggin the Nog.

  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 14:16 | #3

    May be biased by the Welsh element – my favourite episode is where Ivor sings ‘hen wlad fy nhadau’

  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 15:21 | #4

    I’m astonished at Ivor’s supremacy – the poor man’s Thomas the Tank Engine IMHO – railway yard politics and over-simplistic moral parables about hard work, effort and reward and community tensions. Bagpuss on the other hand was rich in the kind of whimsy, original ideas and fertile symbolism that characterise the greatest fiction. No finer preparation for the open-minded, imagination-led life.

    Pretentious, moi?

    “A friend of mine,
    A porcupine,
    Went up in a balloon.
    He sailed it here,
    He sailed it there,
    He sailed it almost everywhere,
    Except, perhaps, the moon.”

  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 15:23 | #5

    I will, however, make an exception for Idris the Dragon, and Dai’s embodiment of all bureaucracy, thus:

    “Livestock must be conveyed in the appropriate container.”

  • James Graham
    Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 15:32 | #6

    I can’t believe I’m reading such drivel from someone normally so sensible. A ‘poor man’s Thomas the Tank Engine’?! Thomas is almost exactly as you describe; Ivor is about as far from it as a children’s animation about steam trains can possibly be.

    Thomas would never have joined the village choir, for one thing. Thomas was all about adventures while Ivor was all about relationships, but with a magic realist twist.

    By contrast, I hate to say it, the whimsy in Bagpuss could at times be quite laboured. And Bagpuss was such an inveterate liar. A pink paper tiger, if you will.

  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 18:48 | #7

    I am likewise disbelieving. That we should come to such a schism! Ivor’s being about “relationships” was half the problem – a pedestrian soap opera to Bagpuss’ rich gallimaufrey of myth, song, history and story-telling. I never thought I’d hear such a thing from the Blogger of the Year*.

    *I see how this could backfire.

  • Friday, December 19th, 2008 at 21:25 | #8

    Much as I hate to disagree with the Award Winning Alix Mortimer, I’m with the gravelly-voiced sex-pot on this one. Ivor is awesome. Look at his subversiveness when faced with a load of fox-hunting toffs! No illiberal and impractical banning from Ivor; he rescues the fox and lets the toffs get on with being toffy…

  • Saturday, December 20th, 2008 at 19:08 | #9

    Furthermore I worry about the extent to which TtTE teaches the importance of deference to the Fat Controller; the enforcement of sex and class stereotypes: that coaches are all female and need to be cosseted and trucks are all working class and need to be treated harshly. The racist epithets may have been edited out of more recent editions, but the conservative idyll remains.

  • Sunday, December 21st, 2008 at 01:12 | #10

    What Joe said.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TOP