Daily Archives: 5 August 2008

Clegg’s COG: now that I have your attention…

My CiF piece yesterday has caused a bit of a stir. Paul Walter suspects that may have been my plan all along – the very idea! Meanwhile Tom Papworth orders me to stop “moaning over our organic, Fairtrade, decaf coffees and get on with selling our party to the electorate.” Frankly, that’s not my job any more. I was asked for my opinion and I gave it (also, I don’t drink coffee).

But there is another strand which is emerging from this debate which I am equally dismissive. That is the “I told you so” response. “Ashamed anonymous” accuses me of voting with my head rather than my heart when I supported Clegg in the leadership election, with Jennie seemingly making a similar point.

I remember things differently. I didn’t vote with my head or my heart in the last leadership election. I found the debate very finely balanced with both candidates having clear strengths and weaknesses. As in all things, I ultimately went with my gut (it’s bigger than the other two combined after all). And despite my criticisms yesterday, I haven’t seen anything to question that. But then, I’ve never personally subscribed to the Sun King theory of leadership. I can cope with Clegg’s occasional cock ups because I view it as an aspect of the job.

My CiF article makes two main criticisms: that internal communication has worsened under Clegg and that the idea of a “Chief Officer’s Group” is wrong headed. I suspect that the former would have been improved with Huhne at the helm simply because he is a more experienced manager. But would Huhne have refrained from setting up something like COG? On that I am more doubtful for the simple reason that it is the culmination of something that has been happening within the party for years now.

I would refer the jury to an article I wrote in 2006 entitled “Sleepwalking to Disaster?” (pdf – pp. 10-11). Back then I was already questioning the centralising trend and put the blame squarely on the activist base which has lost its hunger for actively engaging with the running of the party. Ultimately, I continue to put the blame on their shoulders. If the party decides to this autumn, it could overturn this decision. Even if the FE decides not to make this decision the subject of a business motion at conference, conference could still reject the FE report and it could elect a tranche of new FE members with a specific platform to overturn this decision. My experience in the past however has been that committee reports – a far more important (albeit less exciting) part of conference than policy debates – are only attended by a tiny minority of conference reps.

It’s in recognition of the fact that I’m fundamentally out of kilter with the majority of the party that I have found myself taking a backseat from the party in recent years. I suspect there will be a change of mood, but it is 5-10 years ago. I also, sadly, see it happening as a result of a bad election result.

My problem with Clegg is that he has gone native so soon. Two years of centralising didn’t save Ming. In theory, putting the Parliamentary and Cowley Street staff under one wing should have made communications better: if it has, it’s news to me. Tom Papworth is wrong – and scarily, naively complacent – to say that it has always been thus: a couple of years ago we would never have launched a major publication like Make it Happen without providing parliamentary candidates with a rebuttal guide and further briefing material. The problem is, by restricting all decisions to just a closed circle of people, innovation and a desire to improve on the past are some of the first things that die on their arses.

One thing I am genuinely confused about is why COG has been established while the “Campaigns and Communications Committee” continues to exist (as far as I can tell – again, if you are outside of the charmed circle you have no access to information about how things have been changed. But if the CCC doesn’t exist, then it would appear that Ed Davey, as chair of it, no longer has a job). Yet both do ostensibly the same job, even if the COG is somewhat more wideranging. The CCC is only mentioned by name in the party’s constitution, so if the problem was its composition then the FE could have simply changed it.

I don’t believe this centralising tendency is how business works in the modern world, where the value of autonomous cells is increasingly valued. Looking around the world, I also don’t see it as being at the heart of most political success stories in recent years. The parties which are reinvigorating themselves most successfully at the moment are the ones which are embracing social networking and the power of crowds. The most successful parties always have built wider movements around themselves and this idea is at the heart of the Theory and Practice of Community Politics. Yet centrally the Lib Dems are scared of even having a dynamic party around it.

I don’t believe the Bones Commission managed to come up with an inspiring theory of organisation. My evidence for that is that if it did, the party would already be shouting about it. Either way, given the profound changes which have already been agreed, doesn’t it shock people that the wider party still hasn’t been told?

Ultimately, you should always remember one thing: in the annals of history the two most famous people who “temporarily” suspended democracy for the greater good are Oliver Cromwell and Jar Jar Binks. It isn’t a terribly happy list.

My top ten political blogs

I’ve forgotten to list my top ten political blogs as part of Iain Dale’s annual bout of self publicity round up. Unlike others, I won’t be partaking in any “boycott.” Sure, the fact that it is edited by Iain and mostly publicised by his blog, it will have an inevitable Tory-bias, but so what? Iain can only dominate these things because Iain’s made a success of blogging. I don’t begrudge him that and have no wish to besmirch success in the interests of levelling down. If you want “balance” then organise your own list/awards. I have (the CGB awards) – it’s a doddle.

The list I will be sending to Mr Dale is as follows:

  1. Quaequam Blog! – because two can play the self publicity game! 🙂
  2. Our Kingdom – because it has an interesting range of writers and can generate informed debate (so long as you can get the English Nationalists to shut up for five minutes)
  3. People’s Republic of Mortimer – because it makes me laugh and is an intelligent read.
  4. Antony Hook – one of the most under-rated blogs out there in my view (temporarily down)
  5. Lib Dem Voice – over the last year it has gone from pretending to be the Lib Dem hub to being the Lib Dem hub. Kudos.
  6. Lynne Featherstone – this blog has actually grown on me over the last year as Lynne has thrived under the equalities brief.
  7. Liberal England – still a great staple for commentary and odd miscellenia.
  8. David Boyle – one of the party’s most thoughtful writers who doesn’t get listened to often enough.
  9. Neil Stockley – one of the party’s most throughtful marketeers who doesn’t get listened to often enough.
  10. Liberal Conspiracy – it’s growing on me and found it’s voice over the abortion debate this year. Would still like it to drop the explicit Labour party affiliation, but it’s getting there.

Make it Happen for the laydeez

One of the less remarked upon aspects of Nick Clegg’s “Make it Happen” campaign is the deliberate attempt to appeal to a younger female demographic as part of the initiative:

Rumours that Cleggy will be doing a burlesque striptease as part of his speech this autumn, or that the title of the party’s final manifesto will be “Flashdance” are, however, entirely specious.