<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Chichester and Conway, why not Gray?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185567</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185567</guid>
		<description>Kieran (isn't it?),

Last time I looked I was pretty the exact opposite of a 'practising Christian.'

I'm sorry I make you physically sick. Perhaps if you didn't post anonymous attacks every time you come on here, you wouldn't get this reception.

It would also help if you actually read what I wrote before lumbering in. So, for example, if I provide you with a link to a story about James Gray's financial proclivities, you don't attack me for something else before bothering to read it. 

But then you're a troll so I probably shouldn't even bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kieran (isn&#8217;t it?),</p>
<p>Last time I looked I was pretty the exact opposite of a &#8216;practising Christian.&#8217;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I make you physically sick. Perhaps if you didn&#8217;t post anonymous attacks every time you come on here, you wouldn&#8217;t get this reception.</p>
<p>It would also help if you actually read what I wrote before lumbering in. So, for example, if I provide you with a link to a story about James Gray&#8217;s financial proclivities, you don&#8217;t attack me for something else before bothering to read it. </p>
<p>But then you&#8217;re a troll so I probably shouldn&#8217;t even bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Cowardly Anonymong"</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185565</link>
		<dc:creator>"Cowardly Anonymong"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185565</guid>
		<description>You are clearly a paranoid. I'm not trying to misrepresent anything. I simply wasn't aware there was &lt;i&gt;also&lt;/i&gt; a financial scandal. As a practicing Christian, shouldn't you try to believe the best of your neighbour's motives? 

You make me feel sick. Each time I have tried to communicate with you, if feel like after a meal in McDonald's. Shouldn't I already learn? And you, get a life beside politics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are clearly a paranoid. I&#8217;m not trying to misrepresent anything. I simply wasn&#8217;t aware there was <i>also</i> a financial scandal. As a practicing Christian, shouldn&#8217;t you try to believe the best of your neighbour&#8217;s motives? </p>
<p>You make me feel sick. Each time I have tried to communicate with you, if feel like after a meal in McDonald&#8217;s. Shouldn&#8217;t I already learn? And you, get a life beside politics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185528</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185528</guid>
		<description>I'm not the one trying to misrepresent a scandal with a view to belittling it.  Which one of us should be ashamed of ourselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the one trying to misrepresent a scandal with a view to belittling it.  Which one of us should be ashamed of ourselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Cowardly Anonymong"</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185521</link>
		<dc:creator>"Cowardly Anonymong"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185521</guid>
		<description>You are so unimaginative that you should be ashamed of yourself, if you think being a Conservative is the only reason to stay anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so unimaginative that you should be ashamed of yourself, if you think being a Conservative is the only reason to stay anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185513</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185513</guid>
		<description>Well, the fact you didn't leave your name suggests you are a Conservative, but the point is the James Gray incident is a financial scandal.  He spent months keeping his ex-wife on the payroll and then put his mistress/new wife on the payroll as soon as she was out of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the fact you didn&#8217;t leave your name suggests you are a Conservative, but the point is the James Gray incident is a financial scandal.  He spent months keeping his ex-wife on the payroll and then put his mistress/new wife on the payroll as soon as she was out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowardly Anonymong</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185500</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowardly Anonymong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/06/06/if-chichester-and-conway-why-not-gray/#comment-185500</guid>
		<description>I'm not a Conservative, but perhaps Cameron is drawing a line between financial scandals and sex scandals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a Conservative, but perhaps Cameron is drawing a line between financial scandals and sex scandals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
