<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls (spoilers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/25/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls-spoilers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/25/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls-spoilers/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/25/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls-spoilers/#comment-184194</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/25/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls-spoilers/#comment-184194</guid>
		<description>On knowledge vs. wisdom, I actually agree, and probably should have made this clearer.  For them to use this theme once in Raiders was fair enough, but the problem with Kingdom is that it got in the way and meant that the film was lacking anything vaguely resembling a twist.  They just stuck doggedly to a formula - by film 4 we should have had something of a critique of it.

In terms of the by-election, it isn't as if I haven't written about &lt;a href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/23/the-lib-dems-death-is-being-predicted-once-again/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/james_graham/2008/05/lib_dem_crumbs_of_comfort.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On knowledge vs. wisdom, I actually agree, and probably should have made this clearer.  For them to use this theme once in Raiders was fair enough, but the problem with Kingdom is that it got in the way and meant that the film was lacking anything vaguely resembling a twist.  They just stuck doggedly to a formula - by film 4 we should have had something of a critique of it.</p>
<p>In terms of the by-election, it isn&#8217;t as if I haven&#8217;t written about <a href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/23/the-lib-dems-death-is-being-predicted-once-again/" rel="nofollow">this </a> <a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/james_graham/2008/05/lib_dem_crumbs_of_comfort.html" rel="nofollow">elsewhere</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/25/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls-spoilers/#comment-184190</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/25/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls-spoilers/#comment-184190</guid>
		<description>You may distinguish between knowledge and wisdom, but I actually felt that it was a bit anti-intellectual.  I don't know any academics that would refuse to know more.  That's why we get into the game in the first place, because we're curious.

Good review though.  Although I was hoping for a Lib Dem analysis of last week's by-election!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may distinguish between knowledge and wisdom, but I actually felt that it was a bit anti-intellectual.  I don&#8217;t know any academics that would refuse to know more.  That&#8217;s why we get into the game in the first place, because we&#8217;re curious.</p>
<p>Good review though.  Although I was hoping for a Lib Dem analysis of last week&#8217;s by-election!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
