<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Solid Crewe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/</link>
	<description>crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A byelection veteran</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-183204</link>
		<dc:creator>A byelection veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-183204</guid>
		<description>So does anyone know which byelection(s) Blair apparently turned up at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does anyone know which byelection(s) Blair apparently turned up at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #65 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182841</link>
		<dc:creator>Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #65 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182841</guid>
		<description>[...] No Solid Crewe on James Graham’s Quaequam Blog! States an obvious truth Tories prefer to back off from: their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Solid Crewe on James Graham’s Quaequam Blog! States an obvious truth Tories prefer to back off from: their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Final Victory of Spin &#171; THE PEOPLE&#8217;S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182694</link>
		<dc:creator>The Final Victory of Spin &#171; THE PEOPLE&#8217;S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182694</guid>
		<description>[...] but I can&#8217;t find the reference now. What am I, the Economist sub? UPDATE: Oh, it&#8217;s here look. On his blog. Didn&#8217;t look there.), this is not a particularly exceptional Labour [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but I can&#8217;t find the reference now. What am I, the Economist sub? UPDATE: Oh, it&#8217;s here look. On his blog. Didn&#8217;t look there.), this is not a particularly exceptional Labour [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auberius</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182181</link>
		<dc:creator>Auberius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182181</guid>
		<description>The increased national media aspect is something I fear we may have to learn to live with; I still wonder how Ealing Southall would have gone had there not been so much "Resurgent Tory Party" rubbish going around nationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The increased national media aspect is something I fear we may have to learn to live with; I still wonder how Ealing Southall would have gone had there not been so much &#8220;Resurgent Tory Party&#8221; rubbish going around nationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182150</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182150</guid>
		<description>James, it's not him fooling me, just been thinking this over and chatting to a few people that know the demographic breakdown well...I'm not expecting a Tory victory and certainly not a huge one either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, it&#8217;s not him fooling me, just been thinking this over and chatting to a few people that know the demographic breakdown well&#8230;I&#8217;m not expecting a Tory victory and certainly not a huge one either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182149</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182149</guid>
		<description>Leon - don't let him fool you.  The Tories are entrenched in Crewe and Nantwich.  They should be able to do it in their sleep.  For them to lose this by-election would be apocalyptic for them.  They will end up fighting like cats and dogs amongst themselves if they lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon - don&#8217;t let him fool you.  The Tories are entrenched in Crewe and Nantwich.  They should be able to do it in their sleep.  For them to lose this by-election would be apocalyptic for them.  They will end up fighting like cats and dogs amongst themselves if they lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182147</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;7,000 is hardly a small majority&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Snigger!&lt;/em&gt;  Such poverty of ambition!  In the context of a by-election in the middle of a third term of office, 7,000 is wafer thin.  Surely you don't think it is big?

Compared to Brent East (15,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  Leicester South (16,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  With the Conservative Party's resources?

Delighted to hear the Tories are so nervous, but don't try and pull a fast one here, sunshine.  You're having a giraffe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>7,000 is hardly a small majority</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Snigger!</em>  Such poverty of ambition!  In the context of a by-election in the middle of a third term of office, 7,000 is wafer thin.  Surely you don&#8217;t think it is big?</p>
<p>Compared to Brent East (15,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  Leicester South (16,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  With the Conservative Party&#8217;s resources?</p>
<p>Delighted to hear the Tories are so nervous, but don&#8217;t try and pull a fast one here, sunshine.  You&#8217;re having a giraffe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182146</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182146</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with LFAT, a loss here would not signal a fall back to last summers standing for the Tories. 

I'm not convinced the Tories will win it, a real and likely victory would be for them to soften the seat up ready to take at the next GE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with LFAT, a loss here would not signal a fall back to last summers standing for the Tories. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced the Tories will win it, a real and likely victory would be for them to soften the seat up ready to take at the next GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182131</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182131</guid>
		<description>What rubbish - the Conservatives will not be back to where they were last summer.  7,000 is hardly a small majority and running Labour close to the wire will still show how their support in the 'heartlands' is dwindling.

A Conservative victory would humiliate the government and I sincerely hope this comes to pass.  The fact that the Lib Dems have given up on Crewe might help!

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What rubbish - the Conservatives will not be back to where they were last summer.  7,000 is hardly a small majority and running Labour close to the wire will still show how their support in the &#8216;heartlands&#8217; is dwindling.</p>
<p>A Conservative victory would humiliate the government and I sincerely hope this comes to pass.  The fact that the Lib Dems have given up on Crewe might help!</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
