<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Solid Crewe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A byelection veteran</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-183204</link>
		<dc:creator>A byelection veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-183204</guid>
		<description>So does anyone know which byelection(s) Blair apparently turned up at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does anyone know which byelection(s) Blair apparently turned up at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #65 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182841</link>
		<dc:creator>Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #65 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182841</guid>
		<description>[...] No Solid Crewe on James Grahamâ€™s Quaequam Blog! States an obvious truth Tories prefer to back off from: their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Solid Crewe on James Grahamâ€™s Quaequam Blog! States an obvious truth Tories prefer to back off from: their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Final Victory of Spin &#171; THE PEOPLE&#8217;S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182694</link>
		<dc:creator>The Final Victory of Spin &#171; THE PEOPLE&#8217;S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182694</guid>
		<description>[...] but I can&#8217;t find the reference now. What am I, the Economist sub? UPDATE: Oh, it&#8217;s here look. On his blog. Didn&#8217;t look there.), this is not a particularly exceptional Labour [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but I can&#8217;t find the reference now. What am I, the Economist sub? UPDATE: Oh, it&#8217;s here look. On his blog. Didn&#8217;t look there.), this is not a particularly exceptional Labour [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auberius</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182181</link>
		<dc:creator>Auberius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182181</guid>
		<description>The increased national media aspect is something I fear we may have to learn to live with; I still wonder how Ealing Southall would have gone had there not been so much &quot;Resurgent Tory Party&quot; rubbish going around nationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The increased national media aspect is something I fear we may have to learn to live with; I still wonder how Ealing Southall would have gone had there not been so much &#8220;Resurgent Tory Party&#8221; rubbish going around nationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182150</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182150</guid>
		<description>James, it&#039;s not him fooling me, just been thinking this over and chatting to a few people that know the demographic breakdown well...I&#039;m not expecting a Tory victory and certainly not a huge one either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, it&#8217;s not him fooling me, just been thinking this over and chatting to a few people that know the demographic breakdown well&#8230;I&#8217;m not expecting a Tory victory and certainly not a huge one either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182149</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182149</guid>
		<description>Leon - don&#039;t let him fool you.  The Tories are entrenched in Crewe and Nantwich.  They should be able to do it in their sleep.  For them to lose this by-election would be apocalyptic for them.  They will end up fighting like cats and dogs amongst themselves if they lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon &#8211; don&#8217;t let him fool you.  The Tories are entrenched in Crewe and Nantwich.  They should be able to do it in their sleep.  For them to lose this by-election would be apocalyptic for them.  They will end up fighting like cats and dogs amongst themselves if they lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182147</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;7,000 is hardly a small majority&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Snigger!&lt;/em&gt;  Such poverty of ambition!  In the context of a by-election in the middle of a third term of office, 7,000 is wafer thin.  Surely you don&#039;t think it is big?

Compared to Brent East (15,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  Leicester South (16,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  With the Conservative Party&#039;s resources?

Delighted to hear the Tories are so nervous, but don&#039;t try and pull a fast one here, sunshine.  You&#039;re having a giraffe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>7,000 is hardly a small majority</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Snigger!</em>  Such poverty of ambition!  In the context of a by-election in the middle of a third term of office, 7,000 is wafer thin.  Surely you don&#8217;t think it is big?</p>
<p>Compared to Brent East (15,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  Leicester South (16,000 majority over Lib Dems)?  With the Conservative Party&#8217;s resources?</p>
<p>Delighted to hear the Tories are so nervous, but don&#8217;t try and pull a fast one here, sunshine.  You&#8217;re having a giraffe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182146</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182146</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with LFAT, a loss here would not signal a fall back to last summers standing for the Tories. 

I&#039;m not convinced the Tories will win it, a real and likely victory would be for them to soften the seat up ready to take at the next GE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with LFAT, a loss here would not signal a fall back to last summers standing for the Tories. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced the Tories will win it, a real and likely victory would be for them to soften the seat up ready to take at the next GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/comment-page-1/#comment-182131</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/05/16/no-solid-crewe/#comment-182131</guid>
		<description>What rubbish - the Conservatives will not be back to where they were last summer.  7,000 is hardly a small majority and running Labour close to the wire will still show how their support in the &#039;heartlands&#039; is dwindling.

A Conservative victory would humiliate the government and I sincerely hope this comes to pass.  The fact that the Lib Dems have given up on Crewe might help!

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What rubbish &#8211; the Conservatives will not be back to where they were last summer.  7,000 is hardly a small majority and running Labour close to the wire will still show how their support in the &#8216;heartlands&#8217; is dwindling.</p>
<p>A Conservative victory would humiliate the government and I sincerely hope this comes to pass.  The fact that the Lib Dems have given up on Crewe might help!</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
