Powered by WordPress | Theme by mg12 | Valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 3
  • Would Joseph Rowntree have praised or damned religion?

    Reporting a recent piece of research published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Times adopts this approach:

    A CHARITY set up by an ardent Christian to fight slavery and the opium trade has identified a new social evil of the 21st century – religion.

    A poll by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation uncovered a widespread belief that faith – not just in its extreme form – was intolerant, irrational and used to justify persecution.

    Pollsters asked 3,500 people what they considered to be the worst blights on modern society, updating a list drawn up by Rowntree, a Quaker, 104 years ago.

    The responses may well have dismayed him. The researchers found that the “dominant opinion” was that religion was a “social evil”.

    Would it have dismayed him or confirmed his beliefs? After all, as a Quaker, Rowntree was a non-conformist. No other faith group has done more to promote secularism worldwide than the Quakers and as a group which has been at the sharp end of organised religion in the past, they have some considerable experience of religion as a social evil.

    Besides, the full report paints a more nuanced picture. Religion is only listed as the ninth “evil”, while a decline in values is listed third. If people are decoupling religion from values that can only be a good thing and I suspect Rowntree would have approved as well.

    Rate this:
    1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Antony Hook
    Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008 at 21:37 | #1

    “If people are decoupling religion from values that can only be a good thing”.

    Depends which you values you mean. There has been perhaps a bit too much decoupling from some of religion’s more attractive values.

  • James Graham
    Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 at 09:44 | #2

    Possibly, but the religions themselves are more to blame for that than anything else.

  • Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 at 13:47 | #3

    I was enraged to read your comments on what pensioners require for a comfortable retirement 10,000 & a bird table
    I live on more than this fortunately but do not have a bird table as this area of london is plagued by rats . It is condidered to be one of the better ones .
    Not since Gordon Brown did away with the 10% tax band.

  • James Graham
    Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 at 14:26 | #4

    I don’t recall making such a claim, but if I had I would have thought people would be rather more vexed about the £10k rather than the bird table.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TOP