<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tories lose 4 MPs in less than a year - will James Gray be number 5?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/22/tories-lose-4-mps-in-less-than-a-year-will-james-gray-be-number-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/22/tories-lose-4-mps-in-less-than-a-year-will-james-gray-be-number-5/</link>
	<description>crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Happy Harriet Harman</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/22/tories-lose-4-mps-in-less-than-a-year-will-james-gray-be-number-5/#comment-174403</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy Harriet Harman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/22/tories-lose-4-mps-in-less-than-a-year-will-james-gray-be-number-5/#comment-174403</guid>
		<description>I can assure you that the Labour Party is not interested in Quentin Davies.

In fact, I am quite sure I saw him cowering at the other side of the house near whatever Tories could stomach him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can assure you that the Labour Party is not interested in Quentin Davies.</p>
<p>In fact, I am quite sure I saw him cowering at the other side of the house near whatever Tories could stomach him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
