<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympian Values (UPDATE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/07/olympian-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/07/olympian-values/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/07/olympian-values/#comment-172289</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/07/olympian-values/#comment-172289</guid>
		<description>El Fat:

1) It isn't a copyright issue.  No-one is claiming that the IOC coined the term "Olympics"
2) It isn't actually a trademark issue.  I'm not disputing the Olympics' right to protect its own trademarks.  But you can't trademark a word that is in the public domain and has been used for thousands of years and they haven't attempted to do so.
3) It isn't an international issue.  The Olympics Act doesn't stop me from, say, opening a greasy spoon in Iceland called the "Olympics Gaff" or even the "London 2012 Olympics Gaff".  The Act only applies within the UK's borders.
4) I'm not questioning the legal right, but the moral right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Fat:</p>
<p>1) It isn&#8217;t a copyright issue.  No-one is claiming that the IOC coined the term &#8220;Olympics&#8221;<br />
2) It isn&#8217;t actually a trademark issue.  I&#8217;m not disputing the Olympics&#8217; right to protect its own trademarks.  But you can&#8217;t trademark a word that is in the public domain and has been used for thousands of years and they haven&#8217;t attempted to do so.<br />
3) It isn&#8217;t an international issue.  The Olympics Act doesn&#8217;t stop me from, say, opening a greasy spoon in Iceland called the &#8220;Olympics Gaff&#8221; or even the &#8220;London 2012 Olympics Gaff&#8221;.  The Act only applies within the UK&#8217;s borders.<br />
4) I&#8217;m not questioning the legal right, but the moral right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/07/olympian-values/#comment-172285</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/04/07/olympian-values/#comment-172285</guid>
		<description>Surely the IOC banning people from using the word 'Olympics' is perfectly in line with copyright laws around the world?

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the IOC banning people from using the word &#8216;Olympics&#8217; is perfectly in line with copyright laws around the world?</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
