<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Cameron&#8217;s new pledge: &#8220;I&#8217;m a socialist jihadist conservative&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WHS</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-163991</link>
		<dc:creator>WHS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/#comment-163991</guid>
		<description>Ahmed Hussain was part of the SWP-ite Respect, rather than the Gallowayite Islamist Respect when he defected. It does get confusing though, Heinz 57 varieties, but there is a world of difference in their approach to the Muslim community.

Labelling Hussain personally a jihadist and a defender of Al Qaeda though is beyond the pale. I doubt you could even legitimately extend that epithet to the Gorgeous One, unless you have evidence to the contrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed Hussain was part of the SWP-ite Respect, rather than the Gallowayite Islamist Respect when he defected. It does get confusing though, Heinz 57 varieties, but there is a world of difference in their approach to the Muslim community.</p>
<p>Labelling Hussain personally a jihadist and a defender of Al Qaeda though is beyond the pale. I doubt you could even legitimately extend that epithet to the Gorgeous One, unless you have evidence to the contrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-163929</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/#comment-163929</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, mate, but this is McCarthyism.

&lt;em&gt;Will you denounce Mr X? Eh? Eh? Are you one of THEM? Secretly? No? Then why won&#039;t you inform? Eh?&lt;/em&gt;

Further, I note that you haven&#039;t actually presented any evidence of them a) apologising for Al-Qa&#039;ida or b) advocating violence. They may well be a nasty bunch; their internal politics would seem to support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, mate, but this is McCarthyism.</p>
<p><em>Will you denounce Mr X? Eh? Eh? Are you one of THEM? Secretly? No? Then why won&#8217;t you inform? Eh?</em></p>
<p>Further, I note that you haven&#8217;t actually presented any evidence of them a) apologising for Al-Qa&#8217;ida or b) advocating violence. They may well be a nasty bunch; their internal politics would seem to support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-163883</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/#comment-163883</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t understand the difference between the Lib Dem opposition to the war and the Respect opposition, you&#039;re in the wrong party.  
Respect have consistently been apologists for Al Qaeda and other extremist groups. They are advocates of violent revolutionary struggle and a nasty bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t understand the difference between the Lib Dem opposition to the war and the Respect opposition, you&#8217;re in the wrong party.<br />
Respect have consistently been apologists for Al Qaeda and other extremist groups. They are advocates of violent revolutionary struggle and a nasty bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-163817</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/14/david-camerons-new-pledge-im-a-socialist-jihadist-conservative/#comment-163817</guid>
		<description>In what way is this guy a jihadi? Isn&#039;t that, well, completely fucking libellous?

Further, if in your view being against the invasion of Iraq makes you one, well, you&#039;re in the wrong party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way is this guy a jihadi? Isn&#8217;t that, well, completely fucking libellous?</p>
<p>Further, if in your view being against the invasion of Iraq makes you one, well, you&#8217;re in the wrong party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
