http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/ crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:28:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/#comment-162523 Lee Griffin Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:22:44 +0000 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/#comment-162523 Well, in all fairness they weren't so much saying that it is even likely to be a time machine, more than if popular theory is right no-one should actually be able to travel further back in time than 2008. Well, in all fairness they weren’t so much saying that it is even likely to be a time machine, more than if popular theory is right no-one should actually be able to travel further back in time than 2008.

]]> http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/#comment-162244 James Graham Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:18:05 +0000 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/#comment-162244 I should add that I'm very fond of New Scientist - the good outweighs the fluff and it is honest enough to be having this debate internally. I should add that I’m very fond of New Scientist - the good outweighs the fluff and it is honest enough to be having this debate internally.

]]> http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/#comment-162242 Andy Hinton Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:15:49 +0000 http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/02/11/is-time-travel-the-new-porn/#comment-162242 Well that post ended up in a place I didn't expect. But yes, New Scientist can hardly escape blame for sillyness in science reporting. I can't really be arsed to read popular science magazines, but those of my uni friends who can almost universally agree that Scientific American is better (although I can't vouch for this myself). Well that post ended up in a place I didn’t expect. But yes, New Scientist can hardly escape blame for sillyness in science reporting. I can’t really be arsed to read popular science magazines, but those of my uni friends who can almost universally agree that Scientific American is better (although I can’t vouch for this myself).

]]>