<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230; 25 years later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OneHourAhead &#124; Blogging and that</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-170658</link>
		<dc:creator>OneHourAhead &#124; Blogging and that</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-170658</guid>
		<description>[...] Be it James Graham&#8217;s discussions on the inner workings of the British comic market, Jenny detailing her latest hangover or Ed Fordham&#8217;s daily virtual tours around North London, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Be it James Graham&#8217;s discussions on the inner workings of the British comic market, Jenny detailing her latest hangover or Ed Fordham&#8217;s daily virtual tours around North London, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-156104</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-156104</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on coming out Chris!  For me, miniatures wargaming was something I flirted with until I realised how much you had to spend - and even then they jacked the prices up!  I did go through a period of buying all the rulebooks but for one very simple reason: the artwork, and in particular John Blanche's stuff which I loved.

Having gone through the Dark Heresy rulebook in more detail last night, I fear it is one of those titles that is going to sit on my shelf unplayed.  The deep pessimism of 40K makes for a suitable setting for a wargame, but there's no real drama in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on coming out Chris!  For me, miniatures wargaming was something I flirted with until I realised how much you had to spend - and even then they jacked the prices up!  I did go through a period of buying all the rulebooks but for one very simple reason: the artwork, and in particular John Blanche&#8217;s stuff which I loved.</p>
<p>Having gone through the Dark Heresy rulebook in more detail last night, I fear it is one of those titles that is going to sit on my shelf unplayed.  The deep pessimism of 40K makes for a suitable setting for a wargame, but there&#8217;s no real drama in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Heenan</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Heenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155840</guid>
		<description>"Okay, I admit it, I’m a geek."

Golly, I never suspected a thing... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Okay, I admit it, I’m a geek.&#8221;</p>
<p>Golly, I never suspected a thing&#8230; <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Black</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155749</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155749</guid>
		<description>Confession time.

If we are talking about geekiness. the first White Dwarf I bought was issue 9. And the only money I've ever earned for writng anything was £50 for an article on AD&#38;D Druids (but for a different mgazine than White Dwarf)

I was RPG kind of  guy. Personally , I wouldn't touch miniatures wargaming with a polearm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confession time.</p>
<p>If we are talking about geekiness. the first White Dwarf I bought was issue 9. And the only money I&#8217;ve ever earned for writng anything was £50 for an article on AD&amp;D Druids (but for a different mgazine than White Dwarf)</p>
<p>I was RPG kind of  guy. Personally , I wouldn&#8217;t touch miniatures wargaming with a polearm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155678</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155678</guid>
		<description>Oh, I'm sure it makes sense commercially (I should point out that their business is now pulp fiction as well which by all accounts is doing very well), but it's still bloody annoying.  Either you're in the business or you ain't.  Fundamentally, I don't think they thought enough about their business plan.  The RPG business is not a profitable one - there are loads of dead companies that have fallen by the wayside over the years to tell you that one.  That's why GW abandoned roleplaying in the first place!  I'm not 100% convinced that the prevailing industry wisdom, which seems to be that to survive you have to pile 'em high and sell 'em very expensive, is sustainable.  I feel another blog post coming on...

I have to admit that when I first heard that they were relaunching WFRP my response was to doubt they'd last five years, which is why it took me so long to get around to getting the second edition in the first place.

Ultimately though, I don't think it really matters.  The franchise will probably get licensed off to someone - either Green Ronin will take it on solo or possibly Mongoose (who claim to be doing very well and I seem to recall from my job interview with them were all 40K nuts).  And &lt;a href="http://www.warpstone.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Warpstone&lt;/a&gt; demonstrates that fan material can easily be the match of "official" stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m sure it makes sense commercially (I should point out that their business is now pulp fiction as well which by all accounts is doing very well), but it&#8217;s still bloody annoying.  Either you&#8217;re in the business or you ain&#8217;t.  Fundamentally, I don&#8217;t think they thought enough about their business plan.  The RPG business is not a profitable one - there are loads of dead companies that have fallen by the wayside over the years to tell you that one.  That&#8217;s why GW abandoned roleplaying in the first place!  I&#8217;m not 100% convinced that the prevailing industry wisdom, which seems to be that to survive you have to pile &#8216;em high and sell &#8216;em very expensive, is sustainable.  I feel another blog post coming on&#8230;</p>
<p>I have to admit that when I first heard that they were relaunching WFRP my response was to doubt they&#8217;d last five years, which is why it took me so long to get around to getting the second edition in the first place.</p>
<p>Ultimately though, I don&#8217;t think it really matters.  The franchise will probably get licensed off to someone - either Green Ronin will take it on solo or possibly Mongoose (who claim to be doing very well and I seem to recall from my job interview with them were all 40K nuts).  And <a href="http://www.warpstone.org/" rel="nofollow">Warpstone</a> demonstrates that fan material can easily be the match of &#8220;official&#8221; stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Brotherton</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155672</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Brotherton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155672</guid>
		<description>I read about this on &lt;a href="http://www.gamingreport.com/article.php?sid=24740" rel="nofollow"&gt;GamingReport.com&lt;/a&gt;.  Looks like Black Industries have been told not to take any risks and stick to their core business.  In the light of recent GW profits warning, I can see that this is a sensible "commercial decision" as they face an uncertain future when their Lord of the Rings line has run its course.  

Why would they want to get into the business of producing an RPG? which would only take away from their core business which is little lead figures, books full of pretty pictures of their little lead figures and pots of paint to paint their little lead figures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about this on <a href="http://www.gamingreport.com/article.php?sid=24740" rel="nofollow">GamingReport.com</a>.  Looks like Black Industries have been told not to take any risks and stick to their core business.  In the light of recent GW profits warning, I can see that this is a sensible &#8220;commercial decision&#8221; as they face an uncertain future when their Lord of the Rings line has run its course.  </p>
<p>Why would they want to get into the business of producing an RPG? which would only take away from their core business which is little lead figures, books full of pretty pictures of their little lead figures and pots of paint to paint their little lead figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155569</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155569</guid>
		<description>You could always tell me to grow up, get a life and stop shoving my &lt;em&gt;faux&lt;/em&gt; radical lifestyle down your throat.  That would of course be &lt;em&gt;illiberal&lt;/em&gt;.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could always tell me to grow up, get a life and stop shoving my <em>faux</em> radical lifestyle down your throat.  That would of course be <em>illiberal</em>.  <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Whenman</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155568</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Whenman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/01/31/25-years-later/#comment-155568</guid>
		<description>I don't think "geek" adequately covers this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;geek&#8221; adequately covers this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
