<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadow Cabinet. Who&#8217;s up, who&#8217;s down (and who should be)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/</link>
	<description>crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Youth is wasted on the young &#171; Rupa Huq&#8217;s home on the web</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-140119</link>
		<dc:creator>Youth is wasted on the young &#171; Rupa Huq&#8217;s home on the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-140119</guid>
		<description>[...] 26 year old youth spokesperson has been dumped for a 57 year old. The move has been criticised by leading Lib Dem bloggers. All this from a party who had a leadership contest because it was &#8220;time to pass on the knife [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 26 year old youth spokesperson has been dumped for a 57 year old. The move has been criticised by leading Lib Dem bloggers. All this from a party who had a leadership contest because it was &#8220;time to pass on the knife [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-139680</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-139680</guid>
		<description>I don't think either Jo, Jenny or Lynne are in particularly vulnerable seats.  Cardiff Central is now a (relative) Lib Dem stronghold with us safely holding both the AM and MP and Lynne and Jo are both up against Labour next time in areas where there is little prospect of a leapfrog.

If that were the reason for keeping them out, one would have to wonder why Sarah Teather, Jeremy Browne, David Heath and Susan Kramer are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think either Jo, Jenny or Lynne are in particularly vulnerable seats.  Cardiff Central is now a (relative) Lib Dem stronghold with us safely holding both the AM and MP and Lynne and Jo are both up against Labour next time in areas where there is little prospect of a leapfrog.</p>
<p>If that were the reason for keeping them out, one would have to wonder why Sarah Teather, Jeremy Browne, David Heath and Susan Kramer are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-139679</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-139679</guid>
		<description>I would like to see Lynne, Jo and Jenny do well, but they all have to hold onto their seats at the next general election.
I suspect they need more time to concentrate on that.
I thought the exit of Paul Holmes and Andrew Stunnel was harsh, and  disappointed that Evan Harris is not back in. In fairness to Evan, he may be happy where he is on the science select committee.
The good news is that Norman Baker is back in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Lynne, Jo and Jenny do well, but they all have to hold onto their seats at the next general election.<br />
I suspect they need more time to concentrate on that.<br />
I thought the exit of Paul Holmes and Andrew Stunnel was harsh, and  disappointed that Evan Harris is not back in. In fairness to Evan, he may be happy where he is on the science select committee.<br />
The good news is that Norman Baker is back in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reshuffle reactions: your essential guide &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-139647</link>
		<dc:creator>Reshuffle reactions: your essential guide &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/20/shadow-cabinet-whos-up-whos-down-and-who-should-be/#comment-139647</guid>
		<description>[...] Shadow Cabinet. Who’s up, who’s down (and who should be) on James Graham’s Quaequam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shadow Cabinet. Who’s up, who’s down (and who should be) on James Graham’s Quaequam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
