<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Clegg talks to Quaequam Blog! again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/18/nick-clegg-talks-to-quaequam-blog-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/18/nick-clegg-talks-to-quaequam-blog-again/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Huntbach</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/18/nick-clegg-talks-to-quaequam-blog-again/comment-page-1/#comment-138850</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Huntbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/18/nick-clegg-talks-to-quaequam-blog-again/#comment-138850</guid>
		<description>Clegg&#039;s acceptance speech continued to give me the concerns I have had about him throughout. It was a politician&#039;s speech, saying the sort of things politicians say, using the slogans that the activists like to hear, but not really having that &quot;oomph&quot; which takes it beyond that and makes those who aren&#039;t interested in politics sit up and listen. As a speech from a young wannabe-PPC on his first hustings, it would be great. From the party leader it&#039;s &quot;oh, is that it?&quot;. 

From now on I shall observe a period of silence on Mr Clegg. If I don&#039;t, please remind me of this pledge. I hope to be pleasantly surprised by him and his leadership and I feel my over-critical instincts towards him will not help him develop towards giving me that pleasant surprise if brought out and used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clegg&#8217;s acceptance speech continued to give me the concerns I have had about him throughout. It was a politician&#8217;s speech, saying the sort of things politicians say, using the slogans that the activists like to hear, but not really having that &#8220;oomph&#8221; which takes it beyond that and makes those who aren&#8217;t interested in politics sit up and listen. As a speech from a young wannabe-PPC on his first hustings, it would be great. From the party leader it&#8217;s &#8220;oh, is that it?&#8221;. </p>
<p>From now on I shall observe a period of silence on Mr Clegg. If I don&#8217;t, please remind me of this pledge. I hope to be pleasantly surprised by him and his leadership and I feel my over-critical instincts towards him will not help him develop towards giving me that pleasant surprise if brought out and used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jam today! A chat with the Cleggster &#171; THE PEOPLE&#8217;S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/18/nick-clegg-talks-to-quaequam-blog-again/comment-page-1/#comment-138712</link>
		<dc:creator>Jam today! A chat with the Cleggster &#171; THE PEOPLE&#8217;S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/18/nick-clegg-talks-to-quaequam-blog-again/#comment-138712</guid>
		<description>[...] am going to return for the last two questions another moon, but James has already blogged his (as has the fluffy one) and Linda&#8217;s question touched on positive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am going to return for the last two questions another moon, but James has already blogged his (as has the fluffy one) and Linda&#8217;s question touched on positive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
