<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Huhne: time to get serious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #39 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-114259</link>
		<dc:creator>Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #39 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-114259</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Huhne: time to get serious on James Grahamâ€™s Quaequam Blog! blog. The latest acute and acerbic instalment of Jamesâ€™s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Huhne: time to get serious on James Grahamâ€™s Quaequam Blog! blog. The latest acute and acerbic instalment of Jamesâ€™s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-108512</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-108512</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but you said the rest of the Lib Dems - including Clegg by implication - were backing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but you said the rest of the Lib Dems &#8211; including Clegg by implication &#8211; were backing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-108251</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-108251</guid>
		<description>James, You misrepresent what I said. I made the point that Chris Huhne does not support the legislation at all. I have also written in the Telegraph about how I think the Tories should oppose it, but there are battles going on within the Shadow Cabinet about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, You misrepresent what I said. I made the point that Chris Huhne does not support the legislation at all. I have also written in the Telegraph about how I think the Tories should oppose it, but there are battles going on within the Shadow Cabinet about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-107711</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-107711</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think that this is your best post on the leadership election so far.&quot;

Hmph.  Only because I was critical of Chris Huhne. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think that this is your best post on the leadership election so far.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmph.  Only because I was critical of Chris Huhne. <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon R</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-107704</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-107704</guid>
		<description>Oh, and while I disagree with Huhne&#039;s &#039;vision&#039; of liberalism (I think that he confuses equality of opportunity with simply &#039;equality&#039;, as no one said that equality of opportunity stops after birth), I would like to see Nick do &#039;the vision thing&#039; a bit more and communicate in one line what he thinks liberalism is for.  Sometimes, I get the impression that he is simply better at discussing topics or themes, rather than saying where we are heading to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and while I disagree with Huhne&#8217;s &#8216;vision&#8217; of liberalism (I think that he confuses equality of opportunity with simply &#8216;equality&#8217;, as no one said that equality of opportunity stops after birth), I would like to see Nick do &#8216;the vision thing&#8217; a bit more and communicate in one line what he thinks liberalism is for.  Sometimes, I get the impression that he is simply better at discussing topics or themes, rather than saying where we are heading to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon R</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-107700</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-107700</guid>
		<description>I think that this is your best post on the leadership election so far.  Now Nick has to step it up- we have his view on education, which is something that we should be really proud to sell at the doorstep, and some good stuff on internal reforms.  Now for Health, a liberal foreign policy etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is your best post on the leadership election so far.  Now Nick has to step it up- we have his view on education, which is something that we should be really proud to sell at the doorstep, and some good stuff on internal reforms.  Now for Health, a liberal foreign policy etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-107577</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-107577</guid>
		<description>The really really frustrating thing about the debate around education and health care reform is that more liberal ideas are thrown out as being &#039;right wing&#039; or &#039;american&#039;.

Huhne dismissed vouchers as being &#039;US Style&#039;, yet it is European countries which have led the way, Utah just voted against a voucher system...

Vouchers are an attempt to have a more liberal system, they seek to break up the de-facto monopoly that the state has gained in education, something which was not intended by the original education acts. Local councils used to send children to private schools, originally elected local boards controlled the state sector and they didn&#039;t necessarily supply all the schools.
Vouchers are an attempt, in today&#039;s centralised world, to get back some of that individual autonomy which was to an extent provided for.

On health care, the debate is framed in such a way as to place the US system as the alternative. That is absolute rubbish. Even the opponents of universal health care in the US don&#039;t argue for the current US system, they argue for massive reform.
As to your comment on insurance - health insurance is a great thing, it means we don&#039;t have to pay up front for those events insured against, currently the state provides it and the services (although not particularly well and with high levels of bureaucracy), it also lumps this in with health assurance. I think a good place to start would be to decouple these different aspects of health care (which is in part what some continental systems do).
The big mistake of the NHS is to try and run everything. Localism won&#039;t solve that problem either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really really frustrating thing about the debate around education and health care reform is that more liberal ideas are thrown out as being &#8216;right wing&#8217; or &#8216;american&#8217;.</p>
<p>Huhne dismissed vouchers as being &#8216;US Style&#8217;, yet it is European countries which have led the way, Utah just voted against a voucher system&#8230;</p>
<p>Vouchers are an attempt to have a more liberal system, they seek to break up the de-facto monopoly that the state has gained in education, something which was not intended by the original education acts. Local councils used to send children to private schools, originally elected local boards controlled the state sector and they didn&#8217;t necessarily supply all the schools.<br />
Vouchers are an attempt, in today&#8217;s centralised world, to get back some of that individual autonomy which was to an extent provided for.</p>
<p>On health care, the debate is framed in such a way as to place the US system as the alternative. That is absolute rubbish. Even the opponents of universal health care in the US don&#8217;t argue for the current US system, they argue for massive reform.<br />
As to your comment on insurance &#8211; health insurance is a great thing, it means we don&#8217;t have to pay up front for those events insured against, currently the state provides it and the services (although not particularly well and with high levels of bureaucracy), it also lumps this in with health assurance. I think a good place to start would be to decouple these different aspects of health care (which is in part what some continental systems do).<br />
The big mistake of the NHS is to try and run everything. Localism won&#8217;t solve that problem either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-107507</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/11/13/chris-huhne-time-to-get-serious/#comment-107507</guid>
		<description>Both the leadership contenders are starting to up their game a little, but unfortunately I still don&#039;t think they have inspired the media or the public yet.  None of their policy proposals thus far have offered anything wildly different from what has been proposed in the past (either by the Lib Dems or someone else).

How do they turn this around?  Surely a leadership contest is the perfect opportunity to get some airtime for who the Lib Dems are?

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the leadership contenders are starting to up their game a little, but unfortunately I still don&#8217;t think they have inspired the media or the public yet.  None of their policy proposals thus far have offered anything wildly different from what has been proposed in the past (either by the Lib Dems or someone else).</p>
<p>How do they turn this around?  Surely a leadership contest is the perfect opportunity to get some airtime for who the Lib Dems are?</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
