<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My leadership dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-96909</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-96909</guid>
		<description>Electoral reform.  The NHS. Privatisation.  Let&#039;s talk real issues here and leave the personalities to the media.

[Why all the secrecy about what happened to Ming?  What sort of open party are we if Ming is forbidden from telling us what really happened?]

If I want a conservative I will vote Tory or Labour.  Give us a real alternative, please!  Let&#039;s see where the contenders stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electoral reform.  The NHS. Privatisation.  Let&#8217;s talk real issues here and leave the personalities to the media.</p>
<p>[Why all the secrecy about what happened to Ming?  What sort of open party are we if Ming is forbidden from telling us what really happened?]</p>
<p>If I want a conservative I will vote Tory or Labour.  Give us a real alternative, please!  Let&#8217;s see where the contenders stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #35 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-96602</link>
		<dc:creator>Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #35 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-96602</guid>
		<description>[...] My leadership dilemma on James Graham&#8217;s Quaequam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My leadership dilemma on James Graham&#8217;s Quaequam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95848</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95848</guid>
		<description>Yes, but given the fact that this article was posted at midnight on Wednesday and the total lack of any psychic powers on my part, you&#039;ll have to live with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but given the fact that this article was posted at midnight on Wednesday and the total lack of any psychic powers on my part, you&#8217;ll have to live with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95834</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95834</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t Steve Webb and Susan Kramer ruled themselves out now?

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t Steve Webb and Susan Kramer ruled themselves out now?</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95567</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95567</guid>
		<description>James

I agree with you, the timing is a bit rushed, especially as things quieten down over the Christmas period.  I can&#039;t see why it can&#039;t be stretched out into the New Year.

Still, at least you and other, UK-based members will actually be able to vote.  As I will be abroad from early November until the New Year I&#039;ve been told by Cowley Street that there&#039;s no possibility of me being able to participate: I&#039;d have to change my postal address and I don&#039;t think the postal services lend themselves to a speedy trip between the UK and South America.

Surprising too, to discover the party hasn&#039;t got any method of enabling members to vote electronically or online in place.  I would have thought that a party as wired up as ours would have considered that!

Of course, had the party followed my course and not opted for the &#039;safe pair of hands&#039; option last year, I wouldn&#039;t be trying to find this all out!

C&#039;est la vie!

Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James</p>
<p>I agree with you, the timing is a bit rushed, especially as things quieten down over the Christmas period.  I can&#8217;t see why it can&#8217;t be stretched out into the New Year.</p>
<p>Still, at least you and other, UK-based members will actually be able to vote.  As I will be abroad from early November until the New Year I&#8217;ve been told by Cowley Street that there&#8217;s no possibility of me being able to participate: I&#8217;d have to change my postal address and I don&#8217;t think the postal services lend themselves to a speedy trip between the UK and South America.</p>
<p>Surprising too, to discover the party hasn&#8217;t got any method of enabling members to vote electronically or online in place.  I would have thought that a party as wired up as ours would have considered that!</p>
<p>Of course, had the party followed my course and not opted for the &#8217;safe pair of hands&#8217; option last year, I wouldn&#8217;t be trying to find this all out!</p>
<p>C&#8217;est la vie!</p>
<p>Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95566</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure a Lib Dem raving on about market economics is necessarily going to enthuse the party.  What about all the Lefties that Gordon Brown has abandoned?  Why not chase after their votes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure a Lib Dem raving on about market economics is necessarily going to enthuse the party.  What about all the Lefties that Gordon Brown has abandoned?  Why not chase after their votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Hook</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95500</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Hook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95500</guid>
		<description>James,

It&#039;s not a question of whether we have the stomach to defy the media.  The question is whether we have the means; will we find a leader with a force of quality that the media have to accept?

That question can only be answered by the candidates to be leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a question of whether we have the stomach to defy the media.  The question is whether we have the means; will we find a leader with a force of quality that the media have to accept?</p>
<p>That question can only be answered by the candidates to be leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95457</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95457</guid>
		<description>I have to agree. It&#039;s very easy to get lost in Clegg mania - I can&#039;t help getting rather excited when I see him on television or find something he&#039;s written but I am trying to restrain myself and wait for his actual platform to be revealed.

Obviously the candidate with the most appeal to the broadest base of people would be a good start, and any positive vibes from the media should not be sniffed at considering media relations seem to be our biggest problem.

Still, I&#039;m looking for a reformer and I&#039;m feeling a bit silly about assuming that Clegg will have a reforming agenda... we&#039;ll have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree. It&#8217;s very easy to get lost in Clegg mania &#8211; I can&#8217;t help getting rather excited when I see him on television or find something he&#8217;s written but I am trying to restrain myself and wait for his actual platform to be revealed.</p>
<p>Obviously the candidate with the most appeal to the broadest base of people would be a good start, and any positive vibes from the media should not be sniffed at considering media relations seem to be our biggest problem.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m looking for a reformer and I&#8217;m feeling a bit silly about assuming that Clegg will have a reforming agenda&#8230; we&#8217;ll have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Mayer</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95363</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95363</guid>
		<description>Similar dilemma, slightly different angle. I&#039;ve got a heck of a lot of time for both Chris and Nick. Neither represent something in the party that I oppose. Both have strong but different cases to be leader this time. To explicitly join either leadership campaign then seems somewhat disloyal to the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar dilemma, slightly different angle. I&#8217;ve got a heck of a lot of time for both Chris and Nick. Neither represent something in the party that I oppose. Both have strong but different cases to be leader this time. To explicitly join either leadership campaign then seems somewhat disloyal to the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-95343</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/10/17/my-leadership-dilemma/#comment-95343</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that supporting Nick out of &quot;laziness and habit&quot; is any better than having a malicious agenda, but I take your point.  Maybe I am too hard on Nick, but I went from being one of the people urging him to stand in 2006 to feeling quite browned off by his conduct during the campaign.

I&#039;m not ruling out supporting him though.  I would just like better reasons than charisma and the fact that the media want him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that supporting Nick out of &#8220;laziness and habit&#8221; is any better than having a malicious agenda, but I take your point.  Maybe I am too hard on Nick, but I went from being one of the people urging him to stand in 2006 to feeling quite browned off by his conduct during the campaign.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not ruling out supporting him though.  I would just like better reasons than charisma and the fact that the media want him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
