<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ming toes the Stephen Tall line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/14/ming-toes-the-stephen-tall-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/14/ming-toes-the-stephen-tall-line/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/14/ming-toes-the-stephen-tall-line/#comment-89567</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/14/ming-toes-the-stephen-tall-line/#comment-89567</guid>
		<description>Dave, I don't think any of what you're saying is wildly divergent from what I've been arguing all week.  I might disagree with you when you say that a referendum on EU membership is massively different from a referendum on the Reform Treaty, but I certainly understand where you're coming from.

In short, you're not being radical, which is why I don't think this should be a resigning issue.  But I respect your decision; let's leave it at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I don&#8217;t think any of what you&#8217;re saying is wildly divergent from what I&#8217;ve been arguing all week.  I might disagree with you when you say that a referendum on EU membership is massively different from a referendum on the Reform Treaty, but I certainly understand where you&#8217;re coming from.</p>
<p>In short, you&#8217;re not being radical, which is why I don&#8217;t think this should be a resigning issue.  But I respect your decision; let&#8217;s leave it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaffaUK</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/14/ming-toes-the-stephen-tall-line/#comment-89537</link>
		<dc:creator>GaffaUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/14/ming-toes-the-stephen-tall-line/#comment-89537</guid>
		<description>If some people want to use - or the voters - want to use a referendum on the Reform Treaty as a proxy vote then that is their democratic right. I feel that some people are being plainly patronising towards the British voters in some sort of "that they are too stupid to understand the difference" argument. I suspect those who are pro-Europe would simply prefer to side-step any awkward referendum and previously given promises because they fear they will lose the referendum. Calling for a referendum on membership is clearly a smokescreen and only confuses the issue. I am generally pro-Europe - but I want people of this country to have a say in what speed the EU politically unites. Why is so radical about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some people want to use - or the voters - want to use a referendum on the Reform Treaty as a proxy vote then that is their democratic right. I feel that some people are being plainly patronising towards the British voters in some sort of &#8220;that they are too stupid to understand the difference&#8221; argument. I suspect those who are pro-Europe would simply prefer to side-step any awkward referendum and previously given promises because they fear they will lose the referendum. Calling for a referendum on membership is clearly a smokescreen and only confuses the issue. I am generally pro-Europe - but I want people of this country to have a say in what speed the EU politically unites. Why is so radical about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
