<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why can&#8217;t the BBC get anything right?</title>
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/</link>
	<description>crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Libertine</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88269</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88269</guid>
		<description>The Beeb are at least outplaying the Indy, who appear to believe that the aptly-named shortlist consists solely of Brian Paddick. Which begs the question of whether, philosophically speaking, poor old Chamali and Fiyaz actually have a gender until they exist in print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Beeb are at least outplaying the Indy, who appear to believe that the aptly-named shortlist consists solely of Brian Paddick. Which begs the question of whether, philosophically speaking, poor old Chamali and Fiyaz actually have a gender until they exist in print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jerram</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88252</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jerram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88252</guid>
		<description>The BBC have a "Last updated" field, but make no mention of why and how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC have a &#8220;Last updated&#8221; field, but make no mention of why and how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88245</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88245</guid>
		<description>And it's now corrected!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s now corrected!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88244</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/09/10/why-cant-the-bbc-get-anything-right/#comment-88244</guid>
		<description>I've had a pretty good record of them correcting obvious factual errors like this quickly if reported through their feedback system - but, as you say, there's no way of knowing subsequently that it was ever wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a pretty good record of them correcting obvious factual errors like this quickly if reported through their feedback system - but, as you say, there&#8217;s no way of knowing subsequently that it was ever wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
