<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tooth Review: 1550</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/08/18/tooth-review-1550/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/08/18/tooth-review-1550/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/08/18/tooth-review-1550/#comment-83107</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/08/18/tooth-review-1550/#comment-83107</guid>
		<description>It's not that I don't, objectively speaking, appreciate Clint Langley's work, it just leaves me cold.  I would refer you to Scott McCloud's &lt;a href="http://www.scottmccloud.com/inventions/triangle/triangle.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Big Triangle&lt;/a&gt; for why I think this is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t, objectively speaking, appreciate Clint Langley&#8217;s work, it just leaves me cold.  I would refer you to Scott McCloud&#8217;s <a href="http://www.scottmccloud.com/inventions/triangle/triangle.html" rel="nofollow">Big Triangle</a> for why I think this is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Radcliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/08/18/tooth-review-1550/#comment-83106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Radcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/08/18/tooth-review-1550/#comment-83106</guid>
		<description>Have to agree on the Dredd story. Very much tick boxing its way through 6 pages, although the premise of a woolly liberal touchy-feely scheme was quite amusing. Surprised Mark Oaten didn't appear in it...
I have to disagree with your view of Langley's art in ABC. I find the huge level of detail of his CGI quite stunning, and the vivid background colours and gradients set it all off.
I'll look forward to reading V1 and V2 all together.

Not got to Stone Island yet, but on first glance the Simon Davis art has a lot of his Sinister Dexter look and feel to it (the female lead looks just like the females in SD).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree on the Dredd story. Very much tick boxing its way through 6 pages, although the premise of a woolly liberal touchy-feely scheme was quite amusing. Surprised Mark Oaten didn&#8217;t appear in it&#8230;<br />
I have to disagree with your view of Langley&#8217;s art in ABC. I find the huge level of detail of his CGI quite stunning, and the vivid background colours and gradients set it all off.<br />
I&#8217;ll look forward to reading V1 and V2 all together.</p>
<p>Not got to Stone Island yet, but on first glance the Simon Davis art has a lot of his Sinister Dexter look and feel to it (the female lead looks just like the females in SD).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
