<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to the fifties?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/07/01/back-to-the-fifties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/07/01/back-to-the-fifties/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heppi</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/07/01/back-to-the-fifties/comment-page-1/#comment-70663</link>
		<dc:creator>Heppi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/07/01/back-to-the-fifties/#comment-70663</guid>
		<description>I hate the term &quot;Ms&quot;, not because I am an anti-feminist or because I believe in any 1950s gender stereotype, but because I hate the sound of it. Very ugly. &quot;Muzz&quot;. Arrgh. And it also signifies that whoever I am dealing with has not taken enough interest in me to ascertain my preferred title. Lazy. Of course, I accept the gender-political points, and I would happily welcome a more directly comparative version of &quot;mister&quot;, but it just ain&#039;t happening. I also wonder whether you are missing a move among some career women to maintain their maiden names in their professional life even after marriage. I certainly know a number of women who do just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the term &#8220;Ms&#8221;, not because I am an anti-feminist or because I believe in any 1950s gender stereotype, but because I hate the sound of it. Very ugly. &#8220;Muzz&#8221;. Arrgh. And it also signifies that whoever I am dealing with has not taken enough interest in me to ascertain my preferred title. Lazy. Of course, I accept the gender-political points, and I would happily welcome a more directly comparative version of &#8220;mister&#8221;, but it just ain&#8217;t happening. I also wonder whether you are missing a move among some career women to maintain their maiden names in their professional life even after marriage. I certainly know a number of women who do just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/07/01/back-to-the-fifties/comment-page-1/#comment-70215</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/07/01/back-to-the-fifties/#comment-70215</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re put your finger on something here, James. I&#039;ve had several converstaions along those lines recently. Perhaps a related trend is the rise in casual homphobia among the age cohorts younger than us, expressed not just as belittling patronising homophobic stereotypes, but actual contempt (&#039;that&#039;s so gay&#039; etc.). Is it just not cool to be overtly political?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re put your finger on something here, James. I&#8217;ve had several converstaions along those lines recently. Perhaps a related trend is the rise in casual homphobia among the age cohorts younger than us, expressed not just as belittling patronising homophobic stereotypes, but actual contempt (&#8217;that&#8217;s so gay&#8217; etc.). Is it just not cool to be overtly political?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
