<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How will Local Income Tax affect the rich?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/comment-page-1/#comment-65425</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/#comment-65425</guid>
		<description>James has correctly identified the big practical flaw with LIT

The (bigish) practical problem with a local income tax is how you handle tax on savings.  At the moment the banks deduct basic rate tax from all non-ISA savings accounts.  If you don&#039;t pay tax you can claim it back, if you pay 40% then it goes onto your self-assessment return.

The problem is how do banks handle it when they don&#039;t know what rate to deduct at - sure the banks have my address but it&#039;s going to be a real pain for them to calculate the local rate for everyone.

Now it&#039;s not a huge issue for those people who get most of their income through salary as the income from savings will be a negligible amount by comparision - it is however for those whose income is largely derived from savings/investments.

I suspect the answer will lie in continuing self-assessment which most higher tax payers will be submitting AIUI and working it all out retrospectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James has correctly identified the big practical flaw with LIT</p>
<p>The (bigish) practical problem with a local income tax is how you handle tax on savings.  At the moment the banks deduct basic rate tax from all non-ISA savings accounts.  If you don&#8217;t pay tax you can claim it back, if you pay 40% then it goes onto your self-assessment return.</p>
<p>The problem is how do banks handle it when they don&#8217;t know what rate to deduct at &#8211; sure the banks have my address but it&#8217;s going to be a real pain for them to calculate the local rate for everyone.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s not a huge issue for those people who get most of their income through salary as the income from savings will be a negligible amount by comparision &#8211; it is however for those whose income is largely derived from savings/investments.</p>
<p>I suspect the answer will lie in continuing self-assessment which most higher tax payers will be submitting AIUI and working it all out retrospectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Leunig</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/comment-page-1/#comment-65413</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Leunig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/#comment-65413</guid>
		<description>Virtually no-one who is rich does not pay income tax, indeed, last time I looked the fairly small number of people earning over Â£100k a year paid 30% of total income tax revenues. It is pretty hard to escape income tax unless you can convincingly show that you don&#039;t live here. There are real questions about LIT, but this isn&#039;t one of them: it is progressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtually no-one who is rich does not pay income tax, indeed, last time I looked the fairly small number of people earning over Â£100k a year paid 30% of total income tax revenues. It is pretty hard to escape income tax unless you can convincingly show that you don&#8217;t live here. There are real questions about LIT, but this isn&#8217;t one of them: it is progressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence Boyce</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/comment-page-1/#comment-65283</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Boyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/19/how-will-local-income-tax-affect-the-rich/#comment-65283</guid>
		<description>As someone who does not have a regular income, I must say I find the council tax a real bugger. OK, don&#039;t feel &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; sorry for me, but &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; feel sorry for the elderly who have seen derisory increases in their pensions more than gobbled up by council tax rises.

I have simply &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; been able to understand why we have these two totally different schemes for taxation. When it comes to roads, hospitals, etc., they are paid through progressive taxation, towards which I contribute little at the moment, though have contributed much in the past. But when it comes to local amenities, then it&#039;s, &quot;here&#039;s your share of the tab,&quot; with a rather bizarre progressive element to do with the size of the house you inhabit and may not even own.

So on the face of it, I strongly support a local income tax. But then what do I know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who does not have a regular income, I must say I find the council tax a real bugger. OK, don&#8217;t feel <i>too</i> sorry for me, but <i>do</i> feel sorry for the elderly who have seen derisory increases in their pensions more than gobbled up by council tax rises.</p>
<p>I have simply <i>never</i> been able to understand why we have these two totally different schemes for taxation. When it comes to roads, hospitals, etc., they are paid through progressive taxation, towards which I contribute little at the moment, though have contributed much in the past. But when it comes to local amenities, then it&#8217;s, &#8220;here&#8217;s your share of the tab,&#8221; with a rather bizarre progressive element to do with the size of the house you inhabit and may not even own.</p>
<p>So on the face of it, I strongly support a local income tax. But then what do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
