<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to launch a policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Democrat Voice &#187; Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #17</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/#comment-64189</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Democrat Voice &#187; Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/#comment-64189</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘How not to launch a policy’ on James Graham’s Quaequam Blog! blog. Has the Lib Dems’ newly-announced housing policy been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘How not to launch a policy’ on James Graham’s Quaequam Blog! blog. Has the Lib Dems’ newly-announced housing policy been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/#comment-63121</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/#comment-63121</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  It is notable at how the debate on Iain Dale's website has markedly changed in tone as Tim Leunig has explained the policy, from outright 'typical Lib Dems' hostility to 'er, actually this sounds quite good'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  It is notable at how the debate on Iain Dale&#8217;s website has markedly changed in tone as Tim Leunig has explained the policy, from outright &#8216;typical Lib Dems&#8217; hostility to &#8216;er, actually this sounds quite good&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/#comment-63119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/06/14/how-not-to-launch-a-policy/#comment-63119</guid>
		<description>Among those who have spoken favourably about Commumity Land Auctions is Michael Gove, Conservative Housing spokesperson, who was actually at the launch of the pamphlet you refer to.

For whatever reason the policy has come across as a form of compulsory purchase and council-housebuilding rather than as an amendment to the land-use planning process which already takes place - but one which uses a market mechanism to guide the process instead of the current smoke and mirrors. It's also not come across that landowners can choose whether or not to put their into the process - the land wouldn't be expropriated against their will. It is also important that any proceeds are seen as going to the community, not to "the council."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among those who have spoken favourably about Commumity Land Auctions is Michael Gove, Conservative Housing spokesperson, who was actually at the launch of the pamphlet you refer to.</p>
<p>For whatever reason the policy has come across as a form of compulsory purchase and council-housebuilding rather than as an amendment to the land-use planning process which already takes place - but one which uses a market mechanism to guide the process instead of the current smoke and mirrors. It&#8217;s also not come across that landowners can choose whether or not to put their into the process - the land wouldn&#8217;t be expropriated against their will. It is also important that any proceeds are seen as going to the community, not to &#8220;the council.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
