<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [OPEN THREAD] Reforming privacy laws: a little help?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/04/25/open-thread-reforming-privacy-laws-a-little-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/04/25/open-thread-reforming-privacy-laws-a-little-help/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/04/25/open-thread-reforming-privacy-laws-a-little-help/#comment-50672</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 09:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/04/25/open-thread-reforming-privacy-laws-a-little-help/#comment-50672</guid>
		<description>I'd be interested to read the consultation document, but none of the links appears to work on the 'Better Governance' website. 

FIPR is 'strident', Eridu? Ross would 'bend your ear'? Rather disheartening that those of us actively working to safeguard the privacy that you value are nonetheless described in language that implies obsessively unreasonable hotheads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to read the consultation document, but none of the links appears to work on the &#8216;Better Governance&#8217; website. </p>
<p>FIPR is &#8217;strident&#8217;, Eridu? Ross would &#8216;bend your ear&#8217;? Rather disheartening that those of us actively working to safeguard the privacy that you value are nonetheless described in language that implies obsessively unreasonable hotheads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/04/25/open-thread-reforming-privacy-laws-a-little-help/#comment-48115</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/04/25/open-thread-reforming-privacy-laws-a-little-help/#comment-48115</guid>
		<description>You may want to look at the folks over at &lt;a href="http://www.fipr.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.fipr.org/&lt;/a&gt; (Foundation for Information Policy Research) who have some strident views on this.
I'm sure Ross Anderson will be willing to bend your ear about privacy.

Bruce Schneier also has some very sensible things to say about privacy:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/05/the_value_of_pr.html
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/03/the_future_of_p.html

Personally I think that privacy is a very important issue in today's world. Its come to the forefront sue to the increased ability of others to violate privacy, be they the working for the state, a company or lone individuals.

In a liberal society privacy is essential. We cannot function as private individuals without privacy. Identifying those situations when privacy may be violated is very difficult, but one thing is for certain the claim 'If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear' is a falsehood which must be combated at every opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to look at the folks over at <a href="http://www.fipr.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fipr.org/</a> (Foundation for Information Policy Research) who have some strident views on this.<br />
I&#8217;m sure Ross Anderson will be willing to bend your ear about privacy.</p>
<p>Bruce Schneier also has some very sensible things to say about privacy:<br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/05/the_value_of_pr.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/05/the_value_of_pr.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/03/the_future_of_p.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/03/the_future_of_p.html</a></p>
<p>Personally I think that privacy is a very important issue in today&#8217;s world. Its come to the forefront sue to the increased ability of others to violate privacy, be they the working for the state, a company or lone individuals.</p>
<p>In a liberal society privacy is essential. We cannot function as private individuals without privacy. Identifying those situations when privacy may be violated is very difficult, but one thing is for certain the claim &#8216;If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear&#8217; is a falsehood which must be combated at every opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
