I have to admit that, when I first read that scientists had written to Mark Durkin to ask him, out of the goodness of his heart, not to make DVDs of the Great Global Warming Swindle available for sale (credit: Rob), I blanched. I could more or less have predicted what a drama queen like Durkin’s response would be:
â€œI donâ€™t believe they are interested in â€˜adequate quality controlâ€™ when it comes to the reporting of science, or in a â€˜balanced debateâ€™ about the issues. Too many scientists have staked their reputations Âand built their careers on global warming.
â€œThereâ€™s a hell of a lot riding on this ridiculous theory.â€
I hope, at least, he’s grateful to them for all the extra free publicity.
Having blogged today about the political genius of John Sentamu, I do wish my own ‘team’ would sort itself out sometimes. In my view, the proper response would have been to ask Durkin, since he’s so keen on opposing ‘censorship’, to allow a group of scientists to record an alternative commentary to the film and distribute it on the DVD. It is no a moot point as to whether he would have let them or not: either way, it would have been a win. Either he refused, and we could all point fingers at him and make him look silly, or he’d capitulate, in which case the DVD would be more balanced.
Meanwhile, I do recommend a read of this rebuttal of the Swindle film by the same group of scientists.