I have difficulty accepting your proposition that someone who may homophobic as a legislator loses a right to personal privacy that they would otherwise have.

It feels a bit like saying that people who believe in Scottish independence shouldn’t be entitled to British passports, or that people who murder should be in turn killed themselves.

Needless to say, also have difficulty in accepting that the Noes, including four of our MPs, are automatically homophobic (you don’t use that word but I take it that is what you have in mind) but that is a seperate question. The practical effect of these Regulations is a non-homophobic reason to object to them, for example.

He’s might be a hypocrite if he had backed some sort of Prohibition of Threesomes (First Base Only) Act but he hasn’t he’s backed what called be called the Prohibition of Certain Medieval Religious Beliefs Regulations.