<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing balls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36535</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36535</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;According to the comments, that marketing agency works for Ask.com&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You mean they've gone from branding themselves as a snooty butler (AskJeeves as was) to Che Guevara?  That tells you all you need to know about the vacuous twats at the top of the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>According to the comments, that marketing agency works for Ask.com</p></blockquote>
<p>You mean they&#8217;ve gone from branding themselves as a snooty butler (AskJeeves as was) to Che Guevara?  That tells you all you need to know about the vacuous twats at the top of the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36405</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36405</guid>
		<description>Truly bizarre...

I notice the default search engine on their site is 'ask'. Dunno if it has any relevence...

I love your Levellers observation - I always felt the people who were most enthusiastic about that song were some of the most judgemental of others who didn't conform to their standards. 'There's only one way of life, that's your own (so long as we agree with it)' always seemed to be more accurate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly bizarre&#8230;</p>
<p>I notice the default search engine on their site is &#8216;ask&#8217;. Dunno if it has any relevence&#8230;</p>
<p>I love your Levellers observation - I always felt the people who were most enthusiastic about that song were some of the most judgemental of others who didn&#8217;t conform to their standards. &#8216;There&#8217;s only one way of life, that&#8217;s your own (so long as we agree with it)&#8217; always seemed to be more accurate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36400</link>
		<dc:creator>John Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36400</guid>
		<description>According to the comments, that marketing agency works for Ask.com

Twits: it's not like paper/digital trails are that hard to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the comments, that marketing agency works for Ask.com</p>
<p>Twits: it&#8217;s not like paper/digital trails are that hard to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nikel</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36368</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nikel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/03/13/marketing-balls/#comment-36368</guid>
		<description>If we didn't have a choice about where we access online information then they would have a point. So 75% of people access their information through one source. I have two problems with that - Google hosts virtually no information. Yes it's possible for them for filter it but the variety of opinions that any Google search throws up dashes that theory. Secondly, perhaps 75% of people use Google because they find it the best, quickest, most accurate search engine? Duh.

I'm with you on this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we didn&#8217;t have a choice about where we access online information then they would have a point. So 75% of people access their information through one source. I have two problems with that - Google hosts virtually no information. Yes it&#8217;s possible for them for filter it but the variety of opinions that any Google search throws up dashes that theory. Secondly, perhaps 75% of people use Google because they find it the best, quickest, most accurate search engine? Duh.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
