<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well done Ming!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>Gidley! Gidley!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gidley! Gidley!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, when they were being interviewed after the result on News 24, both Ed Davey and Evan Harris said they wanted a female deputy leader, but weren&#039;t naming any names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, when they were being interviewed after the result on News 24, both Ed Davey and Evan Harris said they wanted a female deputy leader, but weren&#8217;t naming any names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Black</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think Kramer would be a good deputy on her own merits.

Before the election very few Lib Dem MPs were really well-known to the ordinary chap driving to work on the A13 or on the train to Liverpool Street. There was Charles, and perhaps Simon Hughes and Ming.

Now Ming will be definitely well known, and hopefully Charles will be back in a while too, and Chris Huhne is now half-known. We should make sure that Huhne remains known, and I think by making Susan Kramer deputy she should become a very popular and effective extra Lib Dem voice. Not just &#039;Minister for the Today programme but 5 Live too ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think Kramer would be a good deputy on her own merits.</p>
<p>Before the election very few Lib Dem MPs were really well-known to the ordinary chap driving to work on the A13 or on the train to Liverpool Street. There was Charles, and perhaps Simon Hughes and Ming.</p>
<p>Now Ming will be definitely well known, and hopefully Charles will be back in a while too, and Chris Huhne is now half-known. We should make sure that Huhne remains known, and I think by making Susan Kramer deputy she should become a very popular and effective extra Lib Dem voice. Not just &#8216;Minister for the Today programme but 5 Live too &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>I think there is a strong case for a female deputy as there is a respectable range to choose from these days and it would have symbolic importance, but &lt;strong&gt;only&lt;/strong&gt; if the position was more than ceremonial.  For example, what about making the Deputy Leader also the Chair of the Campaigns and Communications Committee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a strong case for a female deputy as there is a respectable range to choose from these days and it would have symbolic importance, but <strong>only</strong> if the position was more than ceremonial.  For example, what about making the Deputy Leader also the Chair of the Campaigns and Communications Committee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Morton</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>David Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>I suppose it there for the taking if Huhne wants it but i&#039;d back susan kramer. I think electing a dvaey/clegg/laws figure looks to much like an annointing of an heir and given that shes highly qualified i think promoting a woman makes sense. no policy brief but a &quot;minister for the today programme&quot; type roll.

given the above and the fact that simon stays as president then i&#039;d go for huhne or kramer as deputy. personally I&#039;d give it to kramer and slot huhne in at the vacancy at either foriegn affairs or home office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it there for the taking if Huhne wants it but i&#8217;d back susan kramer. I think electing a dvaey/clegg/laws figure looks to much like an annointing of an heir and given that shes highly qualified i think promoting a woman makes sense. no policy brief but a &#8220;minister for the today programme&#8221; type roll.</p>
<p>given the above and the fact that simon stays as president then i&#8217;d go for huhne or kramer as deputy. personally I&#8217;d give it to kramer and slot huhne in at the vacancy at either foriegn affairs or home office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilcock</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>All members will make merry...

...under pain of death.

(Well, as you were kind enough to quote from the Flash Gordon movie on my blog...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All members will make merry&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;under pain of death.</p>
<p>(Well, as you were kind enough to quote from the Flash Gordon movie on my blog&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>I am very happy with Ming. He was my third choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very happy with Ming. He was my third choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/03/02/well-done-ming/#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>Right, how long till we can start speculating about the new deputy leader? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, how long till we can start speculating about the new deputy leader? <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
