Comments on: Simon’s Dodgy Dossier

By: Stephen Glenn

Stephen Glenn — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:15:56 +0000

Fortunately James is also not the Messiah.

By: David Morton

David Morton — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:24:41 +0000

James,

This is very funny and i did laugh.out loud. but you are a very naughty boy.

By: Guido Fawkes

Guido Fawkes — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:51:49 +0000

Jock! Yes dats it!

By: James

James — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:33:56 +0000

LOL! Is this some kind of wind up? If a random sample of members using the internet cannot be relied on for reliable indication, then a list of self-selecting Hughes supporters is even worse!

By: Chris Abbott

Chris Abbott — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:27:05 +0000

The best evidence is clear for all to see on the Candidates’ websites. Simon is around 300 ahead of Ming in terms of people signing up and Chris is even further behind.

By: James

James — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:22:21 +0000

You’re right Stephen. Maybe ALL the evidence is wrong. But that is not the same thing as saying that ALL the evidence points towards a Hughes win.

By: Stephen Glenn

Stephen Glenn — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:00:43 +0000

Only 12/1. Gosh I got longer odds on Willie winning Dunfermline.

At that was with only 2 days to go let alone 2 weeks.

By: Jock

Jock — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:45:29 +0000

init?

By: Jock

Jock — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:45:08 +0000

Surely it would be “Them IS both Finnish, init”

By: Guido Fawkes

Guido Fawkes — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:43:01 +0000

The phrasing was deliberate - its a “street” thing.

Your visual joke is better. Will steal.

The “lowest odds”? You can get 30/1!