<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lloyd George would approve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/13/lloyd-george-would-approve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/13/lloyd-george-would-approve/</link>
	<description>crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/13/lloyd-george-would-approve/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/13/lloyd-george-would-approve/#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>I generally agree, James. (Perhaps I am a little less convinced of LIT.) It's good to see areas of consensus like this emerging from the leadership campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally agree, James. (Perhaps I am a little less convinced of LIT.) It&#8217;s good to see areas of consensus like this emerging from the leadership campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
