<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If the cap fits&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/</link>
	<description>“ferocity with a purpose”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Aw, he&#039;s a pussycat really! :-)

Excellent articles Alex - hitting several nails on the head.

On environmental tax I think you may&#039;ve got Chris slightly wrong.  I&#039;ll claim some credit for bringing in the notion to the Tax Commission of green taxes not being revenue-neutral, but Chris has picked up this theme and run with it.  It&#039;s a big shift (and of course some effective green taxes would raise rapidly-decreasing amounts - if they work!) but a hugely effective one and just the sort of thing a Lib Dem leader needs to get airtime.  I think he and I don&#039;t want to prejudge the outcome of the Commission too much - suffice to say that if you think James a bruiser, then watch the encounters I&#039;m about to have with Cable, Laws, Marshall et al!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, he&#8217;s a pussycat really! <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Excellent articles Alex &#8211; hitting several nails on the head.</p>
<p>On environmental tax I think you may&#8217;ve got Chris slightly wrong.  I&#8217;ll claim some credit for bringing in the notion to the Tax Commission of green taxes not being revenue-neutral, but Chris has picked up this theme and run with it.  It&#8217;s a big shift (and of course some effective green taxes would raise rapidly-decreasing amounts &#8211; if they work!) but a hugely effective one and just the sort of thing a Lib Dem leader needs to get airtime.  I think he and I don&#8217;t want to prejudge the outcome of the Commission too much &#8211; suffice to say that if you think James a bruiser, then watch the encounters I&#8217;m about to have with Cable, Laws, Marshall et al!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gadsden</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gadsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/#comment-971</guid>
		<description>And there I was thinking that was a subliminal reference to James&#039;s appearance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there I was thinking that was a subliminal reference to James&#8217;s appearance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilcock</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/02/09/if-the-cap-fits/#comment-970</guid>
		<description>Oh, it&#039;s just a love-in, isn&#039;t it?

Thanks for the plug - and of course I knew you&#039;d be much more tickled by those words than the nice ones about you that I also posted. That&#039;s why I put them in ;-)

I&#039;m trying to think of a more genteel word than &#039;bruiser&#039;, myself. After all, I use a great many reasonably polite words to be very rude about people, rather than a few very rude ones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it&#8217;s just a love-in, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Thanks for the plug &#8211; and of course I knew you&#8217;d be much more tickled by those words than the nice ones about you that I also posted. That&#8217;s why I put them in <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to think of a more genteel word than &#8216;bruiser&#8217;, myself. After all, I use a great many reasonably polite words to be very rude about people, rather than a few very rude ones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
