<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling Ming Short</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angus J Huck</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus J Huck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=211#comment-627</guid>
		<description>NI ETORKIZUNEN ZUBIAN NEBILEN: "I walked on the future's bridge."

In order to evaluate a slogan or catchphrase, I translate it into Basque and see if it will work as the title for a song. And it does. Rather perfectly, in fact (had to supply the verb, though).

Only one difficulty. It tends to suggest that (1) Ming is envisaged as a caretaker leader, and (2) the motives of his key supporters are to some extent Machiavellian.

We need to see more of Ming the statesman, Ming the communicator, Ming the man of honour and principle who rises above the fray.

Unfortunately, his campaign looks a bit of a dog's breakfast at the moment. That is because too many cooks are spoiling the broth. They just haven't thought it through.

If Ming wins (and I think he will), it will be because he is known and liked. Simon will come second, because he is known and generally liked, but has a poorer reputation for competence and statesmanship than Ming.

Chris Huhne won't win. He may well be a marvellous man, but the electors don't know him. However many heavyweight backers he accumulates, members will not vote for someone they barely know.

For my part, I wouldn't even recognise his voice.

But I think he'll get more than the 5% I predicted a few days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NI ETORKIZUNEN ZUBIAN NEBILEN: &#8220;I walked on the future&#8217;s bridge.&#8221;</p>
<p>In order to evaluate a slogan or catchphrase, I translate it into Basque and see if it will work as the title for a song. And it does. Rather perfectly, in fact (had to supply the verb, though).</p>
<p>Only one difficulty. It tends to suggest that (1) Ming is envisaged as a caretaker leader, and (2) the motives of his key supporters are to some extent Machiavellian.</p>
<p>We need to see more of Ming the statesman, Ming the communicator, Ming the man of honour and principle who rises above the fray.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, his campaign looks a bit of a dog&#8217;s breakfast at the moment. That is because too many cooks are spoiling the broth. They just haven&#8217;t thought it through.</p>
<p>If Ming wins (and I think he will), it will be because he is known and liked. Simon will come second, because he is known and generally liked, but has a poorer reputation for competence and statesmanship than Ming.</p>
<p>Chris Huhne won&#8217;t win. He may well be a marvellous man, but the electors don&#8217;t know him. However many heavyweight backers he accumulates, members will not vote for someone they barely know.</p>
<p>For my part, I wouldn&#8217;t even recognise his voice.</p>
<p>But I think he&#8217;ll get more than the 5% I predicted a few days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=211#comment-624</guid>
		<description>Newspapers get read far more than websites, and pretty much every one is summing up his launch with the slogan "bridge to the future".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspapers get read far more than websites, and pretty much every one is summing up his launch with the slogan &#8220;bridge to the future&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=211#comment-623</guid>
		<description>He's outlined his concept of leadership much more persuasively than anyone else, and it includes the desire not to be dictatorial or prescriptive - a vital ability (and something on which some of the others fall slightly short). I think his launch was designed to illustrate that. His website focuses in great detail on his qualities (and hardly at all on his supporters).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s outlined his concept of leadership much more persuasively than anyone else, and it includes the desire not to be dictatorial or prescriptive - a vital ability (and something on which some of the others fall slightly short). I think his launch was designed to illustrate that. His website focuses in great detail on his qualities (and hardly at all on his supporters).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smithy</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Smithy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=211#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Chris' websites seem to be more down than up - another example of dirty tricks from rivals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris&#8217; websites seem to be more down than up - another example of dirty tricks from rivals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=211#comment-621</guid>
		<description>Is that a quote for bloggers4chris, Guido? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a quote for bloggers4chris, Guido? <img src='http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2006/01/20/selling-ming-short/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=211#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Why wait for the future when you can have it now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wait for the future when you can have it now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
