Powered by WordPress | Theme by mg12 | Valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 3
  • Thursday, January 12th, 2006 at 21:37 | #1

    Dead right. I’ll put something on Apollo to that effect.

  • Angus J Huck
    Friday, January 13th, 2006 at 13:00 | #2

    Mark flubbed a few words, but his performance was reasonably polished.

    What I did not like was his sackcloth-and-ashes routine about the Kennedy deposition.

    Why doesn’t he tell the truth? An incompetent and underperforming leader had to go. Why not say it?

    Someone whose name has not been mentioned in all this is that of Lord George-Brown.

    Brown was Wilson’s Foreign Secretary, and Deputy Leader of the Labour Party.

    Brown was far worse than Charles Kennedy. He was incapable of remaining sober anywhere. Especially diplomatic banquets.

    And his rudeness was legendary.

    It was to describe Brown’s behaviour that the press coined the words “tired and emotional”. (”Private Eye” depicted him as Falstaff.)

    When Wilson finally sacked Brown, no-one criticised Wilson for his beastliness to a poor, misunderstood alcoholic. In fact, he was lambasted for having Brown in the first place.

    The difference between Kennedy and Brown is that Kennedy is a nice man, Brown was not.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
1 trackbacks/pingbacks
TOP