<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fairy tale taxation policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2005/11/21/fairy-tale-taxation-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2005/11/21/fairy-tale-taxation-policies/</link>
	<description>"crass, boorish and more a bruiser than blogger" - Alex Wilcock</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quaequam Blog! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Peter Black: where&#8217;s the beef?</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2005/11/21/fairy-tale-taxation-policies/#comment-9091</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaequam Blog! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Peter Black: where&#8217;s the beef?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=77#comment-9091</guid>
		<description>[...] Take the tax policy for example.  I too agree that what I&#8217;ve seen so far is muddled and unfocussed.  But for that, I blame the tax commission.  I&#8217;m also quite sanguine about Ming discussing some of it in public at this late stage - it is dangerous to write policy in a vacuum.  And let&#8217;s not forget that it was Charles Kennedy - not Ming - who started talking to the papers about what was going to be in the paper - as far back as November. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Take the tax policy for example.  I too agree that what I&#8217;ve seen so far is muddled and unfocussed.  But for that, I blame the tax commission.  I&#8217;m also quite sanguine about Ming discussing some of it in public at this late stage - it is dangerous to write policy in a vacuum.  And let&#8217;s not forget that it was Charles Kennedy - not Ming - who started talking to the papers about what was going to be in the paper - as far back as November. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaequam Blog! &#187; Losing the plot</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2005/11/21/fairy-tale-taxation-policies/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaequam Blog! &#187; Losing the plot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=77#comment-135</guid>
		<description>[...] This is the problem with Cable and Kennedy&#8217;s &#8220;Three Bears&#8221; strategy. Nothing too far to the left of Labour or to the right - just squarely in the middle, only nicer. The wheels are starting to come off and the Tax Commission hasn&#8217;t even written its report yet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is the problem with Cable and Kennedy&#8217;s &#8220;Three Bears&#8221; strategy. Nothing too far to the left of Labour or to the right - just squarely in the middle, only nicer. The wheels are starting to come off and the Tax Commission hasn&#8217;t even written its report yet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2005/11/21/fairy-tale-taxation-policies/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/?p=77#comment-107</guid>
		<description>James

I've posted ont his, referring back to one of your earlier posts. I wonder whether the issue is DK and VC or their understanding of what they can get past the party.

I think we need to show that we can tackle the problems the country faces. I´m not sure we are as things stand (

We seem to show a good understanding of the problems the country faced in 1997...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted ont his, referring back to one of your earlier posts. I wonder whether the issue is DK and VC or their understanding of what they can get past the party.</p>
<p>I think we need to show that we can tackle the problems the country faces. I´m not sure we are as things stand (</p>
<p>We seem to show a good understanding of the problems the country faced in 1997&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
